Audit 43695

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$6.31M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-12-07
Auditor: Aronson LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
52301 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - L
628743 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
D5S9JZ1KDP49 Chris Desrosiers Auditee
4135872172 Rob Eby Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Reconciliation to Revenue Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The following is a reconciliation of expenditures presented on the Schedule to revenue recognized on the accompanying Statements of Activities and Changes in Net Assets for the year ended June 30, 2021: Total expenditures per the Schedule $6,311,836 Service fees and other revenue recognized not subject to the Uniform Guidance 67,057,683 Service fees and other revenue recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Activities and Changes in Net Assets $73,369,519
Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of VentureWell under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of VentureWell, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of VentureWell.

Finding Details

Criteria: Management is responsible for reporting each action that equals or exceeds $30,000 in Federal funds for a subaward to a non-Federal entity or Federal agency, to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) per 2 CFR 170.200. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Organization?s subaward agreement and modifications subject to reporting under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act were not submitted to the FSRS as required. The Organization only has one subrecipient, which was selected for testing and this deficiency was discovered. Cause: The required subaward agreements were not filed and without proper controls to detect and prevent issues like this, the Organization was not aware these reports had not been submitted until discovered during the course of the audit. Context: When asked to provide support that the subgrant was submitted to the FSRS during the course of the audit, the Organization noticed that although their internal workspace checklist noted these reports had been submitted, they saw no evidence on the FSRS website that they had been and were unable to determine if or why the reports had not been submitted. Effect: Required subaward agreements were not submitted to the FSRS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that controls be put in place for the timely submission of all required reports and for the review and oversight of this submission process. The individual responsible for submitting reports should provide written evidence to another individual that the reports were submitted. Both of these individuals should be aware of the deadlines outlined in the federal award so that if the reviewer does not receive support that the report was properly submitted, they can immediately follow-up with the other individual in order to prevent an unsubmitted report from going unnoticed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions (unaudited): See Appendix A.
Criteria: Management is responsible for reporting each action that equals or exceeds $30,000 in Federal funds for a subaward to a non-Federal entity or Federal agency, to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) per 2 CFR 170.200. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Organization?s subaward agreement and modifications subject to reporting under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act were not submitted to the FSRS as required. The Organization only has one subrecipient, which was selected for testing and this deficiency was discovered. Cause: The required subaward agreements were not filed and without proper controls to detect and prevent issues like this, the Organization was not aware these reports had not been submitted until discovered during the course of the audit. Context: When asked to provide support that the subgrant was submitted to the FSRS during the course of the audit, the Organization noticed that although their internal workspace checklist noted these reports had been submitted, they saw no evidence on the FSRS website that they had been and were unable to determine if or why the reports had not been submitted. Effect: Required subaward agreements were not submitted to the FSRS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that controls be put in place for the timely submission of all required reports and for the review and oversight of this submission process. The individual responsible for submitting reports should provide written evidence to another individual that the reports were submitted. Both of these individuals should be aware of the deadlines outlined in the federal award so that if the reviewer does not receive support that the report was properly submitted, they can immediately follow-up with the other individual in order to prevent an unsubmitted report from going unnoticed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions (unaudited): See Appendix A.