Audit 43693

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$847,370
Findings
4
Programs
4
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
VSSXS2CLUWG7 Julie Peetz Auditee
5734891317 Robert J. Lock Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2022-001: FFATA Reporting Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: N/A Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.332 Program Title: Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-facilitated Exchanges Pass-through Entity Identifying Number: N/A Award Year: 2021-2022 Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) implemented requirements at 2 CFR Part 170 that require recipients of direct grants and cooperative agreements from the federal government to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more. Recipients should report using the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). The grant agreement for the organization?s Navigator grant awarded in September 2021 included an award term that requires FFATA reporting. Condition: The organization did not complete the required reporting for first-tier subawards on the Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grant award from the U.S. Department of Health and Senior Services. There were 5 subawards made to Area Agencies on Aging under this award totaling $379,574 that exceeded the $30,000 reporting threshold. Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the requirement. Effect: The organization was not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement regarding reporting of subawards. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of FFATA and ensure that all applicable subawards made with federal funds are reported to FSRS as required.
2022-002: Application of De Minimis Indirect Cost Rate Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: N/A Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.332 Program Title: Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-facilitated Exchanges Pass-through Entity Identifying Number: N/A Award Year: 2020-2021; 2021-2022 Questioned Costs: $35,716 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance allows nonfederal entities that have never received a negotiated indirect cost rate to elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) to federal awards. If elected, the rate must be used consistently for all of an organization?s federal awards. 2 CFR 200.1 defines MTDC as ?all direct salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and up to the first $25,000 of each subaward?? Condition: During the fiscal year, the organization elected to begin using the de minimis 10% indirect cost rate on its federal awards. However, the 10% rate was applied to a base that did not exclude the portion of direct subaward costs that exceeded $25,000. This resulted in excess indirect costs being charged to the organization?s Navigator 8 (NAVCA190351-02-02) and Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grants as follows: "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirement to limit subrecipient expenses to the first $25,000 per subaward. Effect: The inclusion of the portion of each subaward greater than $25,000 in the MTDC base resulted in more indirect costs being charged to federal awards during the fiscal year than were allowable under the de minimis indirect cost rate election. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and ensure that the MTDC base is properly applied in future federal grants.
2022-001: FFATA Reporting Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: N/A Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.332 Program Title: Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-facilitated Exchanges Pass-through Entity Identifying Number: N/A Award Year: 2021-2022 Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) implemented requirements at 2 CFR Part 170 that require recipients of direct grants and cooperative agreements from the federal government to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more. Recipients should report using the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). The grant agreement for the organization?s Navigator grant awarded in September 2021 included an award term that requires FFATA reporting. Condition: The organization did not complete the required reporting for first-tier subawards on the Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grant award from the U.S. Department of Health and Senior Services. There were 5 subawards made to Area Agencies on Aging under this award totaling $379,574 that exceeded the $30,000 reporting threshold. Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the requirement. Effect: The organization was not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement regarding reporting of subawards. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of FFATA and ensure that all applicable subawards made with federal funds are reported to FSRS as required.
2022-002: Application of De Minimis Indirect Cost Rate Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: N/A Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.332 Program Title: Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-facilitated Exchanges Pass-through Entity Identifying Number: N/A Award Year: 2020-2021; 2021-2022 Questioned Costs: $35,716 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance allows nonfederal entities that have never received a negotiated indirect cost rate to elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) to federal awards. If elected, the rate must be used consistently for all of an organization?s federal awards. 2 CFR 200.1 defines MTDC as ?all direct salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and up to the first $25,000 of each subaward?? Condition: During the fiscal year, the organization elected to begin using the de minimis 10% indirect cost rate on its federal awards. However, the 10% rate was applied to a base that did not exclude the portion of direct subaward costs that exceeded $25,000. This resulted in excess indirect costs being charged to the organization?s Navigator 8 (NAVCA190351-02-02) and Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grants as follows: "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirement to limit subrecipient expenses to the first $25,000 per subaward. Effect: The inclusion of the portion of each subaward greater than $25,000 in the MTDC base resulted in more indirect costs being charged to federal awards during the fiscal year than were allowable under the de minimis indirect cost rate election. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and ensure that the MTDC base is properly applied in future federal grants.