Audit 42134

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$2.93M
Findings
6
Programs
10
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-29
Auditor: Rbt Cpa's LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
49878 2022-001 - - L
49879 2022-001 - - L
49880 2022-001 - - L
626320 2022-001 - - L
626321 2022-001 - - L
626322 2022-001 - - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.555 National School Lunch Program $642,273 Yes 1
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $560,686 Yes 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $317,440 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $203,459 Yes 1
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $19,783 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $16,557 - 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $16,064 - 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $9,492 Yes 1
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $3,802 - 0
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs $3,050 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
WDDLBXX328M5 Cybil Howard Auditee
5183250319 Victor V. Churchill, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: MATCHING COSTS Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of federal award programs administered by the District, which is described in Note 1 to the District's basic financial statements, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Federal awards that are included in the schedule may be received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards that are passed through from other government agencies. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Certain federal award programs of the District have been charged with indirect costs, based upon a rate established by New York State. The District has elected not to use the 10% deminimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance applied to overall expenditures. Matching costs (the District's share of certain program costs) are not included in the reported expenditures. The basis of accounting varies by federal program consistent with the underlying regulations pertaining to each program. The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtained from the federal financial reports for the applicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reports are prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the District's financial reporting system.
Title: INSURANCE Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of federal award programs administered by the District, which is described in Note 1 to the District's basic financial statements, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Federal awards that are included in the schedule may be received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards that are passed through from other government agencies. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Certain federal award programs of the District have been charged with indirect costs, based upon a rate established by New York State. The District has elected not to use the 10% deminimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance applied to overall expenditures. No insurance is carried specifically to cover equipment purchased with federal funds. Any equipment purchased with federal funds has only a nominal value and is covered by the District's casualty insurance policies.
Title: NON-MONETARY ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of federal award programs administered by the District, which is described in Note 1 to the District's basic financial statements, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Federal awards that are included in the schedule may be received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards that are passed through from other government agencies. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Certain federal award programs of the District have been charged with indirect costs, based upon a rate established by New York State. The District has elected not to use the 10% deminimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance applied to overall expenditures. Non-monetary assistance is reported in the schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received and disbursed. Such assistance has been apportioned to the lunch and breakfast program and total $62,947.
Title: RECONCILIATION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of federal award programs administered by the District, which is described in Note 1 to the District's basic financial statements, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Federal awards that are included in the schedule may be received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards that are passed through from other government agencies. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Certain federal award programs of the District have been charged with indirect costs, based upon a rate established by New York State. The District has elected not to use the 10% deminimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance applied to overall expenditures. The federal expenditures presented in the Schedule reconcile to the State and Federal revenue reported in the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance as follows: Federal Expenditures as reported in the Schedule $2,934,759 plus State Universal Pre-K included in Federal Revenue of 97,200; plus Medicaid of 70,648 equals Federal Aid as reported in the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance of $3,102,607.
Title: RECONCILIATION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of federal award programs administered by the District, which is described in Note 1 to the District's basic financial statements, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Federal awards that are included in the schedule may be received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards that are passed through from other government agencies. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Certain federal award programs of the District have been charged with indirect costs, based upon a rate established by New York State. The District has elected not to use the 10% deminimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance applied to overall expenditures. The federal expenditures presented in the Schedule reconcile to the State and Federal revenue reported in the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance as follows: Federal Expenditures as reported in the Schedule $2,934,759 plus State Universal Pre-K included in Federal Revenue of 97,200; plus Medicaid of 70,648 equals Federal Aid as reported in the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance of $3,102,607.

Finding Details

Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 84.010 Title I Condition: It was also noted that the District?s Title I folders were lacking documentation to meet the District?s AIS internal control plan. Criteria: Children who are economically disadvantaged, children with disabilities, migrant children, and limited English proficient (LEP) children are eligible for Part A services on the same basis as other children who are selected for services. In addition, certain categories of children are considered at risk of failing to meet the State?s student academic achievement standards and are thus eligible for Part A services because of their status. Such children include: children who are homeless; children who participated in a Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or Title I, Part A preschool program at any time in the 2 preceding years; children who received services under the Migrant Education Program under Title I, Part C at any time in the 2 preceding years; and children who are in a local institution for neglected or delinquent children or attending a community day program. From the pool of eligible children, a targeted assistance school selects those children who have the greatest need for special assistance to receive Part A services (Title I, Section 1115 of ESEA (20 USC 6315)). Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: Of the Fifteen Students selected for testing there was five students Title I student folders that lacked a number of documents to meet the District?s requirements per its AIS plan. Effect: Since the specific eligibility requirement is not being adhered to, it could result in other students that are ineligible to receive the federal assistance. Also, with the lack of documentation in the file, it becomes harder to ensure that the students receiving services should be continuing to receive services. Cause: The District started using a new software to track student success. When this new software was implemented, a number of tracking items provided by the old service were dropped and not continued when they should have been. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management begin to follow all aspects of their AIS plan to ensure all proper documentation is gathered and retained in the student?s Title I folder. Perspective: This is a systematic issue in that controls over the requirement to have documentation in the student file has not been followed. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official?s View: The District agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 84.010 Title I Condition: It was also noted that the District?s Title I folders were lacking documentation to meet the District?s AIS internal control plan. Criteria: Children who are economically disadvantaged, children with disabilities, migrant children, and limited English proficient (LEP) children are eligible for Part A services on the same basis as other children who are selected for services. In addition, certain categories of children are considered at risk of failing to meet the State?s student academic achievement standards and are thus eligible for Part A services because of their status. Such children include: children who are homeless; children who participated in a Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or Title I, Part A preschool program at any time in the 2 preceding years; children who received services under the Migrant Education Program under Title I, Part C at any time in the 2 preceding years; and children who are in a local institution for neglected or delinquent children or attending a community day program. From the pool of eligible children, a targeted assistance school selects those children who have the greatest need for special assistance to receive Part A services (Title I, Section 1115 of ESEA (20 USC 6315)). Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: Of the Fifteen Students selected for testing there was five students Title I student folders that lacked a number of documents to meet the District?s requirements per its AIS plan. Effect: Since the specific eligibility requirement is not being adhered to, it could result in other students that are ineligible to receive the federal assistance. Also, with the lack of documentation in the file, it becomes harder to ensure that the students receiving services should be continuing to receive services. Cause: The District started using a new software to track student success. When this new software was implemented, a number of tracking items provided by the old service were dropped and not continued when they should have been. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management begin to follow all aspects of their AIS plan to ensure all proper documentation is gathered and retained in the student?s Title I folder. Perspective: This is a systematic issue in that controls over the requirement to have documentation in the student file has not been followed. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official?s View: The District agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 84.010 Title I Condition: It was also noted that the District?s Title I folders were lacking documentation to meet the District?s AIS internal control plan. Criteria: Children who are economically disadvantaged, children with disabilities, migrant children, and limited English proficient (LEP) children are eligible for Part A services on the same basis as other children who are selected for services. In addition, certain categories of children are considered at risk of failing to meet the State?s student academic achievement standards and are thus eligible for Part A services because of their status. Such children include: children who are homeless; children who participated in a Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or Title I, Part A preschool program at any time in the 2 preceding years; children who received services under the Migrant Education Program under Title I, Part C at any time in the 2 preceding years; and children who are in a local institution for neglected or delinquent children or attending a community day program. From the pool of eligible children, a targeted assistance school selects those children who have the greatest need for special assistance to receive Part A services (Title I, Section 1115 of ESEA (20 USC 6315)). Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: Of the Fifteen Students selected for testing there was five students Title I student folders that lacked a number of documents to meet the District?s requirements per its AIS plan. Effect: Since the specific eligibility requirement is not being adhered to, it could result in other students that are ineligible to receive the federal assistance. Also, with the lack of documentation in the file, it becomes harder to ensure that the students receiving services should be continuing to receive services. Cause: The District started using a new software to track student success. When this new software was implemented, a number of tracking items provided by the old service were dropped and not continued when they should have been. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management begin to follow all aspects of their AIS plan to ensure all proper documentation is gathered and retained in the student?s Title I folder. Perspective: This is a systematic issue in that controls over the requirement to have documentation in the student file has not been followed. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official?s View: The District agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 84.010 Title I Condition: It was also noted that the District?s Title I folders were lacking documentation to meet the District?s AIS internal control plan. Criteria: Children who are economically disadvantaged, children with disabilities, migrant children, and limited English proficient (LEP) children are eligible for Part A services on the same basis as other children who are selected for services. In addition, certain categories of children are considered at risk of failing to meet the State?s student academic achievement standards and are thus eligible for Part A services because of their status. Such children include: children who are homeless; children who participated in a Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or Title I, Part A preschool program at any time in the 2 preceding years; children who received services under the Migrant Education Program under Title I, Part C at any time in the 2 preceding years; and children who are in a local institution for neglected or delinquent children or attending a community day program. From the pool of eligible children, a targeted assistance school selects those children who have the greatest need for special assistance to receive Part A services (Title I, Section 1115 of ESEA (20 USC 6315)). Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: Of the Fifteen Students selected for testing there was five students Title I student folders that lacked a number of documents to meet the District?s requirements per its AIS plan. Effect: Since the specific eligibility requirement is not being adhered to, it could result in other students that are ineligible to receive the federal assistance. Also, with the lack of documentation in the file, it becomes harder to ensure that the students receiving services should be continuing to receive services. Cause: The District started using a new software to track student success. When this new software was implemented, a number of tracking items provided by the old service were dropped and not continued when they should have been. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management begin to follow all aspects of their AIS plan to ensure all proper documentation is gathered and retained in the student?s Title I folder. Perspective: This is a systematic issue in that controls over the requirement to have documentation in the student file has not been followed. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official?s View: The District agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 84.010 Title I Condition: It was also noted that the District?s Title I folders were lacking documentation to meet the District?s AIS internal control plan. Criteria: Children who are economically disadvantaged, children with disabilities, migrant children, and limited English proficient (LEP) children are eligible for Part A services on the same basis as other children who are selected for services. In addition, certain categories of children are considered at risk of failing to meet the State?s student academic achievement standards and are thus eligible for Part A services because of their status. Such children include: children who are homeless; children who participated in a Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or Title I, Part A preschool program at any time in the 2 preceding years; children who received services under the Migrant Education Program under Title I, Part C at any time in the 2 preceding years; and children who are in a local institution for neglected or delinquent children or attending a community day program. From the pool of eligible children, a targeted assistance school selects those children who have the greatest need for special assistance to receive Part A services (Title I, Section 1115 of ESEA (20 USC 6315)). Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: Of the Fifteen Students selected for testing there was five students Title I student folders that lacked a number of documents to meet the District?s requirements per its AIS plan. Effect: Since the specific eligibility requirement is not being adhered to, it could result in other students that are ineligible to receive the federal assistance. Also, with the lack of documentation in the file, it becomes harder to ensure that the students receiving services should be continuing to receive services. Cause: The District started using a new software to track student success. When this new software was implemented, a number of tracking items provided by the old service were dropped and not continued when they should have been. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management begin to follow all aspects of their AIS plan to ensure all proper documentation is gathered and retained in the student?s Title I folder. Perspective: This is a systematic issue in that controls over the requirement to have documentation in the student file has not been followed. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official?s View: The District agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 84.010 Title I Condition: It was also noted that the District?s Title I folders were lacking documentation to meet the District?s AIS internal control plan. Criteria: Children who are economically disadvantaged, children with disabilities, migrant children, and limited English proficient (LEP) children are eligible for Part A services on the same basis as other children who are selected for services. In addition, certain categories of children are considered at risk of failing to meet the State?s student academic achievement standards and are thus eligible for Part A services because of their status. Such children include: children who are homeless; children who participated in a Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or Title I, Part A preschool program at any time in the 2 preceding years; children who received services under the Migrant Education Program under Title I, Part C at any time in the 2 preceding years; and children who are in a local institution for neglected or delinquent children or attending a community day program. From the pool of eligible children, a targeted assistance school selects those children who have the greatest need for special assistance to receive Part A services (Title I, Section 1115 of ESEA (20 USC 6315)). Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: Of the Fifteen Students selected for testing there was five students Title I student folders that lacked a number of documents to meet the District?s requirements per its AIS plan. Effect: Since the specific eligibility requirement is not being adhered to, it could result in other students that are ineligible to receive the federal assistance. Also, with the lack of documentation in the file, it becomes harder to ensure that the students receiving services should be continuing to receive services. Cause: The District started using a new software to track student success. When this new software was implemented, a number of tracking items provided by the old service were dropped and not continued when they should have been. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management begin to follow all aspects of their AIS plan to ensure all proper documentation is gathered and retained in the student?s Title I folder. Perspective: This is a systematic issue in that controls over the requirement to have documentation in the student file has not been followed. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official?s View: The District agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.