Audit 415304

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$3.82M
Findings
4
Programs
11
Organization: Town of Carver (MA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2026-10-26
Auditor: CBIZ CPAS PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1241206 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1241207 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1241208 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1241209 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
EKN6L1LMFKN3 Glenn Cannon Auditee
5088663401 Renee Davis Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the Town of Carver, Massachusetts (the “Town”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Town, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Town.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The amounts reported for the National School Lunch Program – Non-Cash Assistance represent the fair value of commodities received.
The Town has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.
The results of our auditing procedures disclosed an instance of noncompliance which is required to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and which is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2024-003. Our opinion on each major federal program is not modified with respect to these matters. Government Auditing Standards requires the auditor to perform limited procedures on the Town’s response to the noncompliance finding identified in our compliance audit described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. The Town’s response was not subjected to the other auditing procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Name: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Year: 2021 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria or Specific Requirement Recipients of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds are required to submit complete and accurate program Project and Expenditure Reports by the deadlines established by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. In addition, recipients should maintain effective internal controls over the preparation and review of reports to ensure information reported is accurate, supported, and submitted timely, as required by 2 CFR §200.303. Adequate accounting records should also be maintained to identify and support expenditures reported as direct and pass-through activities. Condition: The Town did not submit its required annual report by the established due date. In addition, the Town did not maintain documented segregation of duties over the preparation and review of the report, as there was no evidence provided to show that the report had been independently reviewed prior to submission. During audit testing, management provided a general ledger detail intended to support amounts reported under the ARPA program. However, the ledger detail incorrectly classified expenditures between direct expenditures and pass-through expenditures. Although the audit team was able to reconcile and validate total program expenditures incurred during the fiscal year and appropriately classify those expenditures into the correct reporting categories for SEFA presentation, management was unable to provide a detailed ledger identifying the appropriate direct expenditures along with transaction dates. As a result, the audit team was unable to trace the direct expenditures reported to supporting accounting records containing the dates necessary to verify the accuracy and completeness of information included in the annual report. Context: The Town was required to submit the annual project and expenditure report for the period of April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024 by April 30, 2024. This report was submitted on December 23, 2024. Cause: The Town's internal controls over ARPA reporting were not sufficiently designed or implemented to ensure: 1. Required reports were completed and submitted by established deadlines. 2. Reports were subject to documented independent review prior to submission. 3. Accounting records captured and maintained sufficient detail to support expenditure classifications and reporting information required by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to submit required reports timely may result in noncompliance with federal reporting requirements and may limit the ability of federal agencies to monitor program performance and expenditures. Additionally, inadequate supporting records and the lack of independent review increase the risk that inaccurate or incomplete information could be reported to the federal government and remain undetected. Questioned Costs - None reported. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should strengthen its internal controls over ARPA reporting by: • Establishing procedures to ensure all required reports are prepared and submitted by applicable deadlines. • Implementing documented supervisory review procedures to provide appropriate segregation of duties between report preparation and approval. • Enhancing its accounting processes to accurately distinguish direct expenditures from passthrough expenditures and maintain detailed supporting records, including transaction dates, sufficient to support all amounts reported to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. • Retaining documentation demonstrating both the preparation and review of all required program reports. Views of Responsible Official: Management’s corrective action plan is included at the end of this report after the Schedule of Prior Year Findings.
Award Name: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Year: 2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Pass Through Agency: Plymouth County Type of Finding: Compliance Internal Control Over Compliance – Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.317 through 200.327, non-Federal entities must maintain and follow documented procurement procedures and conduct procurements in a manner providing full and open competition. Entities must also maintain documentation sufficient to demonstrate compliance with applicable procurement requirements, including the method of procurement used, contractor selection, and basis for contract award. Further, 2 CFR § 200.327 requires contracts funded with federal awards to contain the applicable contract provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200, as applicable to the nature and dollar amount of the procurement. Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.318(i) requires entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transactions, including rationale for the method of procurement, contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition and Context: The Town incurred $860,078 in ARPA expenditures during the fiscal year related to a renovation project. During testing, the Town was unable to provide documentation evidencing that procurement procedures were performed in accordance with Uniform Guidance or state requirements. Specifically, documentation supporting solicitation, competition, contractor selection, cost or price analysis, or other procurement procedures was not provided for audit. In addition, the Town was unable to provide an executed contract for the renovation project. As a result, the audit team was unable to determine whether the contract contained the federally required provisions outlined in Appendix II to Part 200, including any clauses applicable to the nature and amount of the award. Cause: Management did not establish or maintain adequate internal controls to ensure Federally funded procurements were conducted and documented in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements, procurement documentation was retained to support contractor selection and contract award decisions and executed contracts were maintained and reviewed to ensure inclusion of all applicable federal contract provisions. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documentation demonstrating compliance with federal procurement requirements, the Town cannot support that full and open competition was obtained or that the procurement was conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, because an executed contract was not available for review, the Town cannot demonstrate that required federal contract provisions were included. These deficiencies increase the risk of improper procurement practices, reduced transparency, and noncompliance with federal award requirements. Questioned Costs: Because the Town was unable to provide documentation supporting compliance with federal procurement requirements for the renovation project, the $860,078 in expenditures associated with the procurement are questioned. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should maintain documentation supporting all stages of the procurement process, including solicitation, evaluation, contractor selection, and cost or price analysis and ensure executed contracts are retained for all federally funded procurements. The Town should also implement a review process to verify that all applicable contract provisions required by Appendix II to Part 200 are included in federally funded contracts before execution. Views of Responsible Official: Management’s corrective action plan is included at the end of this report after the Schedule of Prior Year Findings.