Audit 412813

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$1.52M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-09-29
Auditor: BROWN PLUS

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1237992 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes I
1237993 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
MF2TM6GNXGE5 Jennell Miller Auditee
7172385416 Lauren Fenner Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The Crime Victim Assistance Grants provide financial support services to crime victims thorugh eligible crime victim assistance programs. The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants Program provides states, tribes and local governments with critical funding necessary to support a range of program areas including law enforcement; prosecution and court; prevention and education; corrections and community corrections; drug treatment and enforcement; planning, evaluation and technology improvement; crime victim and witness initiatives and mental health programs and related law enforcement and corrections programs, including behavioral programs and crisis intervention teams. The National Priority Safety Program provide resources to reduce the number of highways deaths through protection programs, state traffic safety improvements and impaired driving countermeasures. The Project Safe Neighborhoods is a nationwide initiative that brings together federal, state, local, tribal and territorial law enforcement officials, prosecutors, community-based partners and other stakeholders to identify a community's most pressing violent-crime problems and develop comprehensive solutions. Its goal is to reduce violent crime through coordinated, targeted and data-driven strategies, including collaboration among justice-system and community partners. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Discretionary Safety Grants and Cooperative Agreements provide technical and financial assistance to state and local government agencies, for-profit and non-profit organizations, educational institutions, hospitals, and other persons (as defined in Title 1 USC Chapter (1)) in support of highway safety research and development, special studies, educational and public awereness projects related to or involving: 1) activities, including demonstration projects to study vehicle, highway, driver, passenger, motorcyclist, bicyclist and pedestrain characteristics, 2) emergency medical services communications and transportation of the injured, 3) human behavioral factors such as driver education, impaired driving and distracted driving, 4) evaluation of the effectiveness of countermeasures to increase highway and traffic safety, including occupant protection and alcohol- and drug-impaired driving technologied and initiatives, 5) development of technologies to detect drug impaired drivers; 6) research, evaluation and identification of best practices related to driver education programs (including driver education curricula, instructor training and certification, program administration and delivery mechanisms) and recommendations for harmonizing driver education and multistage graduated licensing systems. 7) effect of State laws on any aspects, activities or programs described above.

Finding Details

Finding number 2025-001, significant deficiency in internal controls over major federal programs – suspension and debarment verification not performed Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Justice Pass-through entity: Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency Federal Program: Crime Victim Assistance, ALN 16.575 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance compliance requirement for Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, recipients must establish and follow written procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal statutes and the requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Contracts and subawards under covered transactions must not be made with parties listed in the General Services Administration's System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions. Condition: The Institute does not have formal written policies or procedures addressing suspension and debarment requirements applicable to covered transactions under federal awards. Specifically, the Institute's procurement policies do not require personnel to: • Determine whether a transaction is a covered transaction subject to suspension and debarment requirements; • Verify vendors or contractors against SAM Exclusions prior to entering into covered transactions; • Retain documentation of SAM Exclusions searches or other allowable verification procedures in the procurement or grant file; and • Assign responsibility for performing and reviewing suspension and debarment verification. Although management indicated that staff generally use vendors known to the Institute, no formal control has been established requiring suspension and debarment verification before covered transactions are executed. Cause: The Institute does not have a procurement policy that incorporates the suspension and debarment compliance requirements applicable to federal awards. Effect: Without formal written suspension and debarment procedures, the Institute may enter into covered transactions with parties that are suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal programs. Such transactions could result in noncompliance with federal award requirements and may expose the Institute to disallowed costs, repayment obligations or other remedies imposed by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: N/A Recommendation: Management should develop written procurement policies and procedures that incorporate suspension and debarment requirements for federal award transactions. At a minimum, the revised procedures should: • Define covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment verification requirements; • Require SAM Exclusions verification prior to entering into covered transactions with vendors or contractors; • Require documentation retention, such as screenshots, search results, vendor certifications or contract clauses, as applicable; • Assign responsibility for performing and reviewing suspension and debarment verification; • Incorporate the procedures into procurement approvals, grant checklists or contract review workflows; and • Provide periodic training to personnel involved in federal procurement and grant administration. Implementation of these procedures will help ensure that contracts and subawards under covered transactions are not made with parties that are suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this finding and will develop written procurement policies incorporating suspension and debarment procedures for covered transactions under federal awards. The procedures will require documented SAM Exclusions verification prior to approving covered transactions and will identify personnel responsible for performing and reviewing the verification.