FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): CY 2022, SWIF220329 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Town received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $140,378 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). During the audit period, the Town expended these funds out of the revenue loss use category. The Treasury has decided that only some of the provisions in the Uniform Guidance apply to the revenue loss use category, as such, the provisions related to procurement, per the Treasury, are not applicable to the revenue loss use category. Therefore, the Town's use of its SLFRF funds received directly from the Treasury are not subject to procurement testing. In addition, the Town received an SLFRF allocation of $800,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority through the State Water Infrastructure or Transportation (SWIF) grant program. These funds are subject to the procurement provisions as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. The suspension and debarment provisions apply to all SLFRF funds regardless of use category or who (Treasury or other entity) awarded the funds. Procurement - Policy (SWIF award) Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The Town did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement - Simplified Acquisition (SWIF award) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Two vendors were identified that fell within the SAT. Both vendors were selected for testing. One of the vendors, paid with SWIF funds, was originally contracted for $84,840, which is below the simplified acquisition threshold. At that time, the Town obtained quotes as would have been required at the small purchase threshold. However, the Town elected to change the scope of the project once SLFRF funds were awarded to cover additional improvements. As the scope of the project changed and the total price increased to over $429,000, more than 20 percent above of the original contract price, the project should have been reviewed and bid out. Since the new total of the project was over the SAT and formal procurement methods were not adhered to, this vendor was not properly procured. Suspension and Debarment (Treasury award) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the Town was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the Town to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the money received directly from the Treasury, the Town stated procedures had not been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the direct SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Both transactions were examined to determine whether the Town verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendors prior to payment. The Town had not performed procedures to ensure the two vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance for procurement was isolated to the SLFRF SWIF funding, and the noncompliance for suspension and debarment was isolated to the SLFRF direct funding. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The items is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Indiana Code 5-22-10-9 states: "A purchasing agent may make a special purchase when purchase of the required supplies or services under another purchasing method under this article would seriously impair the functioning of the using agency." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the Town to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold were not properly bid. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): CY 2022, SWIF220329 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Town received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $140,378 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). During the audit period, the Town expended these funds out of the revenue loss use category. The Treasury has decided that only some of the provisions in the Uniform Guidance apply to the revenue loss use category, as such, the provisions related to procurement, per the Treasury, are not applicable to the revenue loss use category. Therefore, the Town's use of its SLFRF funds received directly from the Treasury are not subject to procurement testing. In addition, the Town received an SLFRF allocation of $800,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority through the State Water Infrastructure or Transportation (SWIF) grant program. These funds are subject to the procurement provisions as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. The suspension and debarment provisions apply to all SLFRF funds regardless of use category or who (Treasury or other entity) awarded the funds. Procurement - Policy (SWIF award) Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The Town did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement - Simplified Acquisition (SWIF award) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Two vendors were identified that fell within the SAT. Both vendors were selected for testing. One of the vendors, paid with SWIF funds, was originally contracted for $84,840, which is below the simplified acquisition threshold. At that time, the Town obtained quotes as would have been required at the small purchase threshold. However, the Town elected to change the scope of the project once SLFRF funds were awarded to cover additional improvements. As the scope of the project changed and the total price increased to over $429,000, more than 20 percent above of the original contract price, the project should have been reviewed and bid out. Since the new total of the project was over the SAT and formal procurement methods were not adhered to, this vendor was not properly procured. Suspension and Debarment (Treasury award) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the Town was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the Town to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the money received directly from the Treasury, the Town stated procedures had not been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the direct SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Both transactions were examined to determine whether the Town verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendors prior to payment. The Town had not performed procedures to ensure the two vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance for procurement was isolated to the SLFRF SWIF funding, and the noncompliance for suspension and debarment was isolated to the SLFRF direct funding. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The items is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Indiana Code 5-22-10-9 states: "A purchasing agent may make a special purchase when purchase of the required supplies or services under another purchasing method under this article would seriously impair the functioning of the using agency." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the Town to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold were not properly bid. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): CY 2022, SWIF220329 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Town received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $140,378 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). During the audit period, the Town expended these funds out of the revenue loss use category. The Treasury has decided that only some of the provisions in the Uniform Guidance apply to the revenue loss use category, as such, the provisions related to procurement, per the Treasury, are not applicable to the revenue loss use category. Therefore, the Town's use of its SLFRF funds received directly from the Treasury are not subject to procurement testing. In addition, the Town received an SLFRF allocation of $800,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority through the State Water Infrastructure or Transportation (SWIF) grant program. These funds are subject to the procurement provisions as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. The suspension and debarment provisions apply to all SLFRF funds regardless of use category or who (Treasury or other entity) awarded the funds. Procurement - Policy (SWIF award) Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The Town did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement - Simplified Acquisition (SWIF award) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Two vendors were identified that fell within the SAT. Both vendors were selected for testing. One of the vendors, paid with SWIF funds, was originally contracted for $84,840, which is below the simplified acquisition threshold. At that time, the Town obtained quotes as would have been required at the small purchase threshold. However, the Town elected to change the scope of the project once SLFRF funds were awarded to cover additional improvements. As the scope of the project changed and the total price increased to over $429,000, more than 20 percent above of the original contract price, the project should have been reviewed and bid out. Since the new total of the project was over the SAT and formal procurement methods were not adhered to, this vendor was not properly procured. Suspension and Debarment (Treasury award) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the Town was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the Town to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the money received directly from the Treasury, the Town stated procedures had not been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the direct SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Both transactions were examined to determine whether the Town verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendors prior to payment. The Town had not performed procedures to ensure the two vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance for procurement was isolated to the SLFRF SWIF funding, and the noncompliance for suspension and debarment was isolated to the SLFRF direct funding. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The items is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Indiana Code 5-22-10-9 states: "A purchasing agent may make a special purchase when purchase of the required supplies or services under another purchasing method under this article would seriously impair the functioning of the using agency." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the Town to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold were not properly bid. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): CY 2022, SWIF220329 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Town received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $140,378 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). During the audit period, the Town expended these funds out of the revenue loss use category. The Treasury has decided that only some of the provisions in the Uniform Guidance apply to the revenue loss use category, as such, the provisions related to procurement, per the Treasury, are not applicable to the revenue loss use category. Therefore, the Town's use of its SLFRF funds received directly from the Treasury are not subject to procurement testing. In addition, the Town received an SLFRF allocation of $800,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority through the State Water Infrastructure or Transportation (SWIF) grant program. These funds are subject to the procurement provisions as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. The suspension and debarment provisions apply to all SLFRF funds regardless of use category or who (Treasury or other entity) awarded the funds. Procurement - Policy (SWIF award) Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The Town did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement - Simplified Acquisition (SWIF award) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Two vendors were identified that fell within the SAT. Both vendors were selected for testing. One of the vendors, paid with SWIF funds, was originally contracted for $84,840, which is below the simplified acquisition threshold. At that time, the Town obtained quotes as would have been required at the small purchase threshold. However, the Town elected to change the scope of the project once SLFRF funds were awarded to cover additional improvements. As the scope of the project changed and the total price increased to over $429,000, more than 20 percent above of the original contract price, the project should have been reviewed and bid out. Since the new total of the project was over the SAT and formal procurement methods were not adhered to, this vendor was not properly procured. Suspension and Debarment (Treasury award) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the Town was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the Town to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the money received directly from the Treasury, the Town stated procedures had not been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the direct SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Both transactions were examined to determine whether the Town verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendors prior to payment. The Town had not performed procedures to ensure the two vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance for procurement was isolated to the SLFRF SWIF funding, and the noncompliance for suspension and debarment was isolated to the SLFRF direct funding. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The items is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Indiana Code 5-22-10-9 states: "A purchasing agent may make a special purchase when purchase of the required supplies or services under another purchasing method under this article would seriously impair the functioning of the using agency." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the Town to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold were not properly bid. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.