Audit 412772

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$1.89M
Findings
1
Programs
14
Organization: Miami County (IN)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-09-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1237984 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.563 CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES $530,140 Yes 0
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $465,290 Yes 1
20.509 FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM $241,176 Yes 0
20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION $203,725 Yes 0
20.526 BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES FORMULA, COMPETITIVE, AND LOW OR NO EMISSIONS PROGRAMS $181,050 Yes 0
21.032 LOCAL ASSISTANCE AND TRIBAL CONSISTENCY FUND $100,000 Yes 0
93.268 IMMUNIZATION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS $48,536 Yes 0
16.575 CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE $43,193 Yes 0
97.042 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANTS $23,806 Yes 0
93.788 OPIOID STR $20,376 Yes 0
93.069 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS $18,063 Yes 0
93.658 FOSTER CARE TITLE IV-E $5,776 Yes 0
20.600 STATE AND COMMUNITY HIGHWAY SAFETY $5,571 Yes 0
15.226 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES $3,773 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
E11PK6A1MB95 Annette Phillippo Auditee
7654723901 Beth Kelley, Cpa, Cfe Auditor
No contacts on file

Finding Details

FINDING 2025-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2025 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expended to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. A population of six covered transactions paid from SLFRF award funds were identified, and three were tested. None of the three covered transactions tested totaling $304,371 included the appropriate provisions in the contract, nor did the County require a certification or check the SAM EPLS to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period and enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 MIAMI COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The recipient and subrecipient must: (a) Establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control-Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the County did not have a formalized suspension and debarment policy to ensure procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements were in place and followed. Effect Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the County develop written policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.