Audit 41271

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$17.87M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Organization: Lansing Housing Commission (MI)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-11-21

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
47259 2022-001 Material Weakness - E
623701 2022-001 Material Weakness - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $12.75M Yes 0
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $4.11M Yes 1
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $885,647 Yes 0
14.871 Covid-19 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers - Emergency Housing Vouchers $110,113 Yes 0
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $14,993 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NJMDAJK9BHU1 Doug Fleming Auditee
5173737996 Lisa Vargo Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Lansing Housing Commission (the Commission) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2021. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Commission, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Commission. Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Commission has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: 14.850, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Public and Indian Housing Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass through Entity: N/A Finding Type: Material weakness Repeat Finding: No Criteria: As a condition of a tenant's admission or continued occupancy, the Commission is required to examine family income and composition at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using documentation from third party verification (24 CFR sections 960.253, 960.257, and 960.259) Condition: For a sample of tenants selected in conjunction with eligibility testing, the Commission did not perform reexaminations within the required 12 month timeline, did not correctly calculate family income composition, and did not retain required documentation supporting eligibility determinations. Questioned Costs: N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed: N/A Context: During testing of 40 tenants selected for eligibility testing, we identified the following issues: For 5 of the 40 tenants selected, the Commission did not perform eligibility reexaminations within 12 months of the previously performed examination. For 1 of the 40 tenants selected, the Commission was unable to provide original documentation from a tenant's file to support that tenant's consent was obtained or that related third party support was obtained in connection with determination of eligibility and calculation of assistance. For 1 of the 40 selections, the Commission did not retain documentation of the tenant's ID/Social Security number to independently verify citizenship For 4 of our 40 selections, the Commission incorrectly calculated the tenants' annual income due to administrative errors leading to inputs in to the calculation not agreeing to the underlying third party income verification received Cause and Effect: Controls to ensure eligibility recertifications were performed in accordance with federal regulations were not consistently followed. This led to an inability by the Commission to identify all timeliness and retention issues, as well as family income composition calculation errors. Recommendation: The Commission should ensure that they have the appropriate controls and personnel in place to perform all reexamintaions in accordance with federal regulations. This includes a proper review to ensure recertifications are completed within the required 12 month period, that family income composition is properly calculated, and that appropriate documentation is retained in the tenant's file to support the eligibility determinations made. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The commission is implementing a plan to audit internally 100% of all tenant files in our Low Income Public Housing (LIPH) program. This plan involves both the use of experienced employees and an outside consultant. The plan includes updating and automating files, identifying recurring compliance issues and expanding formal training and specific training from the consultant. In addition, an additional level of review will be put in place to assist in catching any inconsistencies. The Commission has added additional employees to the LIPH program which include an operations manager and a staff person. These additional resources will be incorporated into our overall plan to increase our compliance controls.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: 14.850, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Public and Indian Housing Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass through Entity: N/A Finding Type: Material weakness Repeat Finding: No Criteria: As a condition of a tenant's admission or continued occupancy, the Commission is required to examine family income and composition at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using documentation from third party verification (24 CFR sections 960.253, 960.257, and 960.259) Condition: For a sample of tenants selected in conjunction with eligibility testing, the Commission did not perform reexaminations within the required 12 month timeline, did not correctly calculate family income composition, and did not retain required documentation supporting eligibility determinations. Questioned Costs: N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed: N/A Context: During testing of 40 tenants selected for eligibility testing, we identified the following issues: For 5 of the 40 tenants selected, the Commission did not perform eligibility reexaminations within 12 months of the previously performed examination. For 1 of the 40 tenants selected, the Commission was unable to provide original documentation from a tenant's file to support that tenant's consent was obtained or that related third party support was obtained in connection with determination of eligibility and calculation of assistance. For 1 of the 40 selections, the Commission did not retain documentation of the tenant's ID/Social Security number to independently verify citizenship For 4 of our 40 selections, the Commission incorrectly calculated the tenants' annual income due to administrative errors leading to inputs in to the calculation not agreeing to the underlying third party income verification received Cause and Effect: Controls to ensure eligibility recertifications were performed in accordance with federal regulations were not consistently followed. This led to an inability by the Commission to identify all timeliness and retention issues, as well as family income composition calculation errors. Recommendation: The Commission should ensure that they have the appropriate controls and personnel in place to perform all reexamintaions in accordance with federal regulations. This includes a proper review to ensure recertifications are completed within the required 12 month period, that family income composition is properly calculated, and that appropriate documentation is retained in the tenant's file to support the eligibility determinations made. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The commission is implementing a plan to audit internally 100% of all tenant files in our Low Income Public Housing (LIPH) program. This plan involves both the use of experienced employees and an outside consultant. The plan includes updating and automating files, identifying recurring compliance issues and expanding formal training and specific training from the consultant. In addition, an additional level of review will be put in place to assist in catching any inconsistencies. The Commission has added additional employees to the LIPH program which include an operations manager and a staff person. These additional resources will be incorporated into our overall plan to increase our compliance controls.