Audit 411545

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$1.37M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-09-21

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1235944 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1235945 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS $838,276 Yes 1
14.850 PUBLIC HOUSING OPERATING FUND $480,803 Yes 1
14.872 PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND $48,640 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
WQHLWVXAD6V5 Arnold Padilla Auditee
9565859756 Antonio Juarez Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the Authority's operations, it is not intended to and does not present the Authority's financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows. Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the financial statements.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized in accordance with the cost principles outlined in the Uniform Guidance, which specifies that certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited in their reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
The Authority did not provide any federal awards to sub-recipients during the year.
The Authority had no outstanding loans or loan guarantee programs on December 31, 2025.
The Authority has elected not to use the 10% De Minimus Indirect Cost Rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance

Finding Details

Criteria Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting to ensure transactions are completely and accurately recorded and supported. Effective controls should include maintaining complete tenant occupancy and billing records, reconciling subsidiary records to the general ledger, and periodically reviewing tenant billing activity to ensure rental revenue and tenant receivable balances are accurately recorded. Condition During audit procedures, the Authority could not provide a tenant rent roll for the period January 1, 2025, through April 30, 2025. For the remainder of the audit period, the Authority provided a tenant rent roll containing tenant names and rent charges; however, it was incomplete and did not reconcile to tenant billing records maintained in the general ledger. The tenant files had these exceptions: • The tenant billing activity was not recorded in the general ledger for two (2) of the twenty (20) tenants sampled from the tenant records. • Three (3) of twenty (20) tenants tested were billed amounts that differed from the amounts supported by tenant rent documentation and HUD Form 50058 records. • The Authority did not maintain formal written policies or procedures requiring the preparation, maintenance, review, or reconciliation of tenant rent roll information to tenant billing records and the general ledger. Although tenant files selected for testing contained supporting HUD Form 50058 documentation, the Authority did not maintain adequate controls to ensure tenant billing information was complete, accurate, and consistently reconciled to accounting records throughout the audit period. Cause The Authority had not established or implemented adequate written policies and procedures to: • Maintain complete tenant rent roll records throughout the year; • Retain tenant rent roll information for all reporting periods; • Reconcile tenant rent rolls to tenant billing records and the general ledger; • Verify billing amounts agree with approved tenant rent calculations; and • Perform documented supervisory review over tenant billing and occupancy records. Effect The lack of complete tenant rent roll records and reconciliation procedures increased the risk that tenant billings, tenant accounts receivable, and rental revenue could be incomplete or inaccurate. As a result: • Certain tenants were not reflected in tenant billing records maintained in the general ledger. • Certain tenant billing amounts differed from approved rent calculations. • Management could not readily demonstrate the completeness and accuracy of tenant billing activity for the entire audit period. • Errors and omissions may not be identified and corrected in a timely manner. Although the identified billing discrepancies were not material to the financial statements, the exceptions indicate that internal controls over tenant billing and related financial reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs None Identified. Repeat Finding No
Criteria HUD regulations require public housing authorities to determine and document that the rent charged to Housing Choice Voucher participants is reasonable in comparison to rents charged for comparable unassisted units in the private market. Rent reasonableness determinations must be performed before executing a Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract and whenever there is a rent increase request from the owner. The Authority must maintain documentation supporting the determination in the tenant file. Condition During our testing of Housing Choice Voucher tenant files, we noted that the Authority did not consistently perform and/or adequately document rent reasonableness determinations prior to approving Housing Assistance Payments contracts and rent increase requests. Specifically, of the 20 tenant files tested, 2 tenants had billing activity not recorded in the general ledger, and 3 files lacked sufficient documentation evidencing that a rent reasonableness review was performed and approved before the effective date of the HAP contract or rent adjustment. As a result, the Authority could not demonstrate compliance with HUD rent reasonableness requirements for these transactions. The exception rate identified during testing was 5 out of 20 files tested, representing approximately 25% of the sample selected for compliance testing. Cause The Authority's procedures for ensuring that rent reasonableness determinations are completed and documented were not operating effectively. Management did not maintain adequate supervisory review controls to verify that supporting documentation was completed, retained, and included in tenant files before approval of rental assistance payments. Effect Failure to perform and document rent reasonableness determinations increases the risk that the Authority may approve assistance payments for units with rents that exceed comparable market rents. As a result, federal funds may not be expended in accordance with HUD requirements.