Audit 410242

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$27.76M
Findings
4
Programs
17
Organization: City of Olathe, Kansas (KS)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-09-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1228598 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes I
1228599 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes I
1228600 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes I
1228601 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
RN6SR5HCMK79 Lucas Mellinger Auditee
9139719034 Kevin Smith Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

City of Olathe, Kansas (the City) is the recipient of several federal awards. All federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as those awards passed through other government agencies, are recorded on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information presented in this schedule is in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in, the preparation of the basic financial statements. The City elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate.
Local cost sharing is required by certain federal grants. The amount of cost sharing varies with each program. Only the federal share of expenditures is presented in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.
Grantor agencies reserve the right to conduct additional audits of the City’s grant programs for economy and efficiency and program results that may result in disallowed costs to the City. However, management does not believe such audits would result in any disallowed costs that would be material to the City’s financial positions at December 31, 2025.
The City had the following loan balances outstanding at December 31, 2025. New loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the schedule. CDBG (ALN 14.218) - $1,951,673; HOME (ALN 14.239) - $1,634,571
Grant numbers are not listed for several grants on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. For those grants, passed through grantors have not assigned passed through numbers to the passed through grants noted in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.

Finding Details

Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions that are suspended or debarred. Before entering into a covered transaction, the entity must verify that the contractor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our testing, we noted the City did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. The City did not retain documentation that the suspension and debarment status of contractors were verified prior to entering into the contract. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that adequate suspension and debarment documentation was not maintained for one out of five vendors that required suspension and debarment checks. Cause: The City’s controls were not sufficient to ensure that contractors’ suspension and debarment status was documented prior to entering into the contract. Effect: The City could have entered into an agreement with a contractor that was suspended or debarred. Although the City was able to demonstrate that contracts were not entered into with vendors who were suspended or debarred, the absence of documentation performed prior to contract execution presents a risk of noncompliance with applicable procurement regulations. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the City design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into transactions with contractors. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.