Audit 409131

FY End
2026-03-31
Total Expended
$11.20M
Findings
1
Programs
4
Year: 2026 Accepted: 2026-08-14

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1226937 2026-001 Material Weakness Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS $4.87M Yes 1
14.850 PUBLIC HOUSING OPERATING FUND $3.16M Yes 0
14.872 PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND $3.10M Yes 0
14.870 RESIDENT OPPORTUNITY AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES - SERVICE COORDINATORS $62,578 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
N8ACKEX3MA25 Jaclyn Vinson Auditee
2174443101 Dale R. Rector Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended March 31, 2026. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Authority.
The Authority provided no federal awards to subrecipients during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026.
The Housing Authority received no federal awards of non-monetary assistance that are required to be disclosed for the year ended March 31, 2026. The Housing Authority had no loans, loan guarantees, or federally restricted endowment funds required to be disclosed for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. The Housing Authority maintains the following limits of insurance as of March 31, 2026: Property & equipment $ 25,000,000 Liability $ 1,000,000 Commercial Auto $ 1,000,000 Worker Compensation Statutory Public Officials Liability $ 1,000,000 Public Employee Dishonesty $ 300,000 Settled claims have not exceeded the above commercial insurance coverage limits over the past three years.

Finding Details

Finding 2026-001 – Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files – Eligibility – Internal Control over Tenant Files - Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency Housing Choice Voucher Program – ALN 14.871 Condition & Cause: We reviewed thirty Housing Choice Voucher tenant files and noted five files (16.7% of the sample) with exceptions related to the calculation and verification of annual income. Exceptions included data entry errors resulting in overstated income, errors in the annualization of earned income, failure to remove overpayments before calculating annual income, and contribution income that was not independently verified with the contributor or accurately reported on the 50058. Based on extrapolation, the potential misstatement of HAP expense due to the identified noncompliance is negligible. The exceptions identified above are attributable primarily to staff vacancies and turnover within the HCV department. Management of another housing authority during the review period may have placed additional demands on available staff and resources. Criteria: Housing Choice Voucher program participants are subject to eligibility and file documentation requirements established by 24 CFR Part 982, 24 CFR § 5.609, HUD Handbook 4350.3, applicable HUD notices, and the Agency's HCV Administrative Plan. Effect: Failure to accurately verify and calculate annual income can result in improper HAP payments, contrary to program requirements and the Agency's mission. Recommendation: Management should conduct a review of tenant files to determine the extent of income calculation and verification deficiencies beyond the sampled population. Additionally, management should evaluate and strengthen its existing quality control process to ensure exceptions are identified and corrected timely. This may include increasing the frequency or sample size of current file reviews until compliance improves to an acceptable level. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Was sampling statistically valid? Yes Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendations.