Audit 407886

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$4.19M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: City of Echo (OR)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-07-24

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1224627 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABHL
1224628 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes ABHL

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $3.89M Yes 2
66.202 CONGRESSIONALLY MANDATED PROJECTS $295,051 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MHGFLFFC3Y33 David Slaght Auditee
5413766038 Rebecca Price Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the City of Echo, Oregon under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City of Echo, Oregon, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the City of Echo, Oregon.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
The City of Echo has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls and for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and disclosures in the financial statements, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: The City does not have a system of internal controls that would enable management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles which could lead to material errors that may not be identified and corrected by the City. As such, management requested me to prepare a draft of the financial statements, including the related footnote disclosures. Cause: Due to cost and other considerations, the City requested we draft the financial statements. Effect: The control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: The outsourcing of these services is not unusual in entities of your size and is a result of management's cost benefit decision to rely on my accounting expertise rather than incurring this internal resource cost. It is the responsibility of management and those charged with governance to make the decision whether to accept the degree of risk associated with this condition because of cost of other considerations. Views of Responsible Officials: The City has elected to have the auditors draft the financial statements and related notes, as they do not believe the risk of material misstatement outweighs the cost of implementing additional controls.
Criteria: An effective system of internal controls depends on an adequate segregation of duties with respect to the execution and recording of transactions, as well as the custody of an entity’s assets. Accordingly, an effective system of internal control will be designed such that these functions are performed by different employees, so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to its completion. Condition: The City has a limited number of office personnel, which prevents an ideal segregation of duties for controls over financial reporting. Cause: Management oversight is done on an information basis. Effect: The lack of segregation of duties increases the risk of fraud related to misappropriation of assets, financial statement misstatement, or both. Recommendation: Management, the Mayor and the City Council should continually be aware of the financial accounting and reporting requirements of the City. Under this situation, the most effective control is the City Council’s oversight and knowledge of matters relating to the operations of the City. Views of Responsible Officials: The Mayor and City Council performed various oversight roles throughout the year but is aware of the risk relating to limited staff performing the daily activities and they do not believe the risk of material misstatement outweighs the cost of hiring additional staff.