Audit 407307

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$1.00M
Findings
28
Programs
8
Organization: Golden House, Inc. (WI)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-07-16
Auditor: KERBERROSE

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1223853 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223854 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223855 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223856 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223857 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223858 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223859 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223860 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223861 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223862 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223863 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223864 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223865 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223866 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1223867 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223868 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223869 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223870 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223871 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223872 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223873 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223874 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223875 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223876 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223877 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223878 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223879 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1223880 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZKVFNBQGN153 Jenny Ostertag Auditee
9204350100 Zachary Linsmeyer Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards includes the federal and state grant activity of the Organization under programs of the federal and state governments for the year ended December 31, 2025. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a select portion of operations of the Organization, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, change in net position, or cash flows of the Organization.
Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Golden House, Inc. did not use the 10% de minimis cost rate.
Of the federal expenditures presented in the schedule, Golden House, Inc. provided no federal awards to subrecipients.
The Organization’s state oversight agency is the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Finding Details

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls and for the fair presentation of financial position, change in net assets, and disclosures in the financial statements and the schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards, in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Cause: During our audit, we noted that although the Organization’s employees are capable of recording cash receipts and disbursements, there is not the expertise to accrue proper amounts and to prepare the annual audited financial statements and the related disclosures and the schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards in accordance with GAAP. Condition: Management requested that KerberRose SC assist in preparing a draft of the audited financial statements, including the related footnote disclosures and the schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards. The outsourcing is a result of management’s cost/benefit decision to use our accounting expertise rather than incurring this internal resource cost. Effect: Although the auditors are proposing the necessary adjustments to convert the general ledger to accrual and also preparing the financial statements and related footnotes and the schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards, management of the Organization thoroughly reviews them and accepts responsibility for their completeness and accuracy. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to make this decision on a cost/benefit basis. Management’s Response: The Organization will continue to rely on the outside assistance of their auditors in this area because it is the most cost-effective solution.
#2025-003 - Lack of Authorization for Expenses Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.403 requires costs to be necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Additionally, the Organization’s internal policies mandate written prior approval before incurring federal expenditures. Cause: Program staff bypassed standard procurement workflows to expedite payments. Additionally, the finance department processed the grant reimbursement requests without verifying that the supporting packages contained the required signatures. Condition: We identified federal grant expenditures that were charged to the program without documented evidence of prior review, approval, or formal authorization by the designated individual. We tested a sample of 20 non-payroll disbursements charged to the federal program. Of these, 2 transactions lacked documented approval. The total population of non-payroll disbursements for this award was $487,816. Effect: The Organization is out of compliance with federal documentation standards. Failure to approve costs pre-disbursement can result in unallowable expenses being charged to the federal award, leading to potential claw backs of funds by the granting agency. Recommendation: Management should reinforce existing policies and require documentation for all approvals. Management’s Response: The Organization is implementing a new approval process.