Audit 40696

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$2.28M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Organization: Villagereach (WA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-08
Auditor: Clark Nuber P S

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
46135 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B
46136 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B
622577 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B
622578 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
98.001 Usaid Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas $11,272 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
NKG1STLQCDK5 Ann Holmes Auditee
2065121533 Troy Rector Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1 - Basis of PresentationThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity ofVillageReach and Subsidiary (collectively, the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization. Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesExpenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.Expenses incurred under federal programs are subject to audit by the awarding agencies. If, as a result of such an audit, certain expenses incurred are determined to be nonreimbursable, the Organization may be liable for repayment of disallowed expenses previously claimed or received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance for allowable costs related to cost allocation. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Titles: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Pass ? Through Entity: PATH Award Numbers: 72065618CA00001, AID.2134.01708827-SUB Award Periods: May 14, 2018 through April 23, 2024 and February 12, 2021 to December 12, 2021 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303, Internal Controls, require that a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context The Organization?s internal controls require review and approval of costs charged to the Federal awards by a knowledgeable and authorized individual to ensure that costs are accurately allocated and charged. For one of employee selections out of the 40 total selections tested, we noted that the gross salary entered in the allocator for several months was higher than the actual gross wages earned. This resulted in an overcharge of $150 to the federal award. However, the employee was paid correctly for these months. For another selected employee from the 40 selections we tested, the June backpay was inadvertently included in the August payroll allocation resulting in an overall allocation error of $1,957. However, the overcharge to the federal award out of this total error was $1,161. Again, the employee was paid correctly. For one other selection tested, the payroll allocation was pulling May and June hours in the calculation instead of just June, resulting in an undercharge of $240 to the federal award. Management performed additional follow up and noted that this allocation error for June 2022 affected 7 employees in total including the one above. The known extrapolated misstatement was approximately $1,951. The employees were correctly paid. Cause The Organization?s internal controls failed to prevent, or detect and timely correct, these payroll errors from occurring. Effect These payroll errors resulted in over and under charges to the federal awards which could result in questioned costs. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2021-003. Recommendation We recommend the Organization evaluate where manual payroll processes could be automated to reduce input errors and provide continuous oversight of cost allocations to ensure they are accurately calculated and recorded. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance for allowable costs related to cost allocation. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Titles: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Pass ? Through Entity: PATH Award Numbers: 72065618CA00001, AID.2134.01708827-SUB Award Periods: May 14, 2018 through April 23, 2024 and February 12, 2021 to December 12, 2021 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303, Internal Controls, require that a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context The Organization?s internal controls require review and approval of costs charged to the Federal awards by a knowledgeable and authorized individual to ensure that costs are accurately allocated and charged. For one of employee selections out of the 40 total selections tested, we noted that the gross salary entered in the allocator for several months was higher than the actual gross wages earned. This resulted in an overcharge of $150 to the federal award. However, the employee was paid correctly for these months. For another selected employee from the 40 selections we tested, the June backpay was inadvertently included in the August payroll allocation resulting in an overall allocation error of $1,957. However, the overcharge to the federal award out of this total error was $1,161. Again, the employee was paid correctly. For one other selection tested, the payroll allocation was pulling May and June hours in the calculation instead of just June, resulting in an undercharge of $240 to the federal award. Management performed additional follow up and noted that this allocation error for June 2022 affected 7 employees in total including the one above. The known extrapolated misstatement was approximately $1,951. The employees were correctly paid. Cause The Organization?s internal controls failed to prevent, or detect and timely correct, these payroll errors from occurring. Effect These payroll errors resulted in over and under charges to the federal awards which could result in questioned costs. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2021-003. Recommendation We recommend the Organization evaluate where manual payroll processes could be automated to reduce input errors and provide continuous oversight of cost allocations to ensure they are accurately calculated and recorded. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance for allowable costs related to cost allocation. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Titles: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Pass ? Through Entity: PATH Award Numbers: 72065618CA00001, AID.2134.01708827-SUB Award Periods: May 14, 2018 through April 23, 2024 and February 12, 2021 to December 12, 2021 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303, Internal Controls, require that a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context The Organization?s internal controls require review and approval of costs charged to the Federal awards by a knowledgeable and authorized individual to ensure that costs are accurately allocated and charged. For one of employee selections out of the 40 total selections tested, we noted that the gross salary entered in the allocator for several months was higher than the actual gross wages earned. This resulted in an overcharge of $150 to the federal award. However, the employee was paid correctly for these months. For another selected employee from the 40 selections we tested, the June backpay was inadvertently included in the August payroll allocation resulting in an overall allocation error of $1,957. However, the overcharge to the federal award out of this total error was $1,161. Again, the employee was paid correctly. For one other selection tested, the payroll allocation was pulling May and June hours in the calculation instead of just June, resulting in an undercharge of $240 to the federal award. Management performed additional follow up and noted that this allocation error for June 2022 affected 7 employees in total including the one above. The known extrapolated misstatement was approximately $1,951. The employees were correctly paid. Cause The Organization?s internal controls failed to prevent, or detect and timely correct, these payroll errors from occurring. Effect These payroll errors resulted in over and under charges to the federal awards which could result in questioned costs. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2021-003. Recommendation We recommend the Organization evaluate where manual payroll processes could be automated to reduce input errors and provide continuous oversight of cost allocations to ensure they are accurately calculated and recorded. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance for allowable costs related to cost allocation. Federal Agency: United States Agency for International Development Program Titles: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Pass ? Through Entity: PATH Award Numbers: 72065618CA00001, AID.2134.01708827-SUB Award Periods: May 14, 2018 through April 23, 2024 and February 12, 2021 to December 12, 2021 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303, Internal Controls, require that a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context The Organization?s internal controls require review and approval of costs charged to the Federal awards by a knowledgeable and authorized individual to ensure that costs are accurately allocated and charged. For one of employee selections out of the 40 total selections tested, we noted that the gross salary entered in the allocator for several months was higher than the actual gross wages earned. This resulted in an overcharge of $150 to the federal award. However, the employee was paid correctly for these months. For another selected employee from the 40 selections we tested, the June backpay was inadvertently included in the August payroll allocation resulting in an overall allocation error of $1,957. However, the overcharge to the federal award out of this total error was $1,161. Again, the employee was paid correctly. For one other selection tested, the payroll allocation was pulling May and June hours in the calculation instead of just June, resulting in an undercharge of $240 to the federal award. Management performed additional follow up and noted that this allocation error for June 2022 affected 7 employees in total including the one above. The known extrapolated misstatement was approximately $1,951. The employees were correctly paid. Cause The Organization?s internal controls failed to prevent, or detect and timely correct, these payroll errors from occurring. Effect These payroll errors resulted in over and under charges to the federal awards which could result in questioned costs. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2021-003. Recommendation We recommend the Organization evaluate where manual payroll processes could be automated to reduce input errors and provide continuous oversight of cost allocations to ensure they are accurately calculated and recorded. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.