Audit 406656

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$3.56M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-07-07

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1223101 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABCHL
1223102 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABCHL

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.959 BLOCK GRANTS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE $478,512 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
NDCZFN4ZJKQ3 Sara Harwood Auditee
2173488108 Larry D Nichols Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activity of all federal award programs of Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council for the year ended June 30, 2025. All federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through other government agencies are included on the schedule. There were no federal awards expended in the form of noncash assistance, and there were no insurance programs in effect during the year or loans/loan guarantees outstanding at year end. No federal awards were provided to subrecipients. The Council did use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate during the year.
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented using the accrual basis of accounting.

Finding Details

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COST ALLOCATION - The Council did not follow their policy to charge direct costs and use appropriate cost allocation methods as required under Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) when reporting activity to the Illinois Department of Human Services on their monthly cost reimbursement reports. Professional standards require that we report this weakness. When reviewing direct costs and cost allocations retroactively applied to support funding related to federal funding received, some allocations assigned were not reasonably apportioned to the grants referenced in the questioned costs. A number of category/program expenditures were charged monthly by taking 1/12 of the approved budget as an estimate of the expenditures supporting the program. The Council was unable to provide cost allocation supported by appropriate documentation for those costs in question. The organization's programs overall are focused on an interrelated mission of substance abuse prevention and treatment. Organization-wide costs maintaining this overall responsibility more than exceeded the funding received. Effective efforts should be engaged to document the allocation of such costs assigned to these similar programs. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the Council follow its fiscal policy to report direct costs and apply appropriate cost allocations to ensure adequate support for reporting.