Audit 405996

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$3.22M
Findings
3
Programs
12
Organization: City of Daphne (AL)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1221734 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1221735 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1221736 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
16.922 EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM $182,555 Yes 0
20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION $153,629 Yes 1
20.939 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL $107,061 Yes 0
97.067 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM $79,447 Yes 0
16.738 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM $49,568 Yes 0
16.710 PUBLIC SAFETY PARTNERSHIP AND COMMUNITY POLICING GRANTS $39,193 Yes 0
15.435 GOMESA $22,573 Yes 0
45.310 GRANTS TO STATES $20,000 Yes 0
93.045 SPECIAL PROGRAMS FOR THE AGING, TITLE III, PART C, NUTRITION SERVICES $16,956 Yes 0
16.607 BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM $8,090 Yes 0
11.419 COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION AWARDS $6,664 Yes 0
21.016 EQUITABLE SHARING $3,847 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LDHSFAMW4L68 Kelli Reid Auditee
2516201220 Erin Jones Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) includes the federal award activity of the City of Daphne, Alabama (the City) under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2025. The information in the SEFA is presented accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City. Therefore, some amounts presented in the SEFA may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements.

Finding Details

Condition: We noted that the applicable wage determination information was not included in the funding agreement and related contract documentation for the project selected for testing. The City relied on Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) to ensure all federally required provisions were included in the bid specifications and contracts. Although certified payrolls were submitted and the contractor complied with prevailing wage requirements, the required documentation was not formally included in the agreement package. Criteria: Federal regulations require that contracts and subcontracts for construction projects in excess of $2,000 financed with federal assistance funds include the applicable prevailing wage provisions and wage determinations under the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act). In addition, contractors and subcontractors are required to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week work is performed. These requirements are established by 40 USC 3141–3147; 29 CFR Part 5; and 2 CFR section 200.326. Cause: The City relied on ALDOT’s review and approval process for inclusion of required federal labor standard provisions and did not perform an independent verification that all Wage Rate Requirement provisions and wage determinations were included in the executed agreements. Effect: Failure to include all required Wage Rate Requirement provisions and documentation in construction agreements could result in noncompliance with federal requirements and increases the risk that contractors may not be properly informed of applicable prevailing wage requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement procedures to independently verify that all federally required contract provisions, including applicable wage determinations and Davis-Bacon provisions, are included in bid specifications, contracts, and funding agreements prior to execution, even when projects are administered in coordination with third parties such as ALDOT. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management stated the project was administered through ALDOT and the City historically relied on ALDOT to ensure all required federal provisions were included in project documentation. Management noted that the funding agreement for this project did not include the wage determination information, although ALDOT later confirmed the requirements were applicable and certified payrolls were submitted. Management further indicated the contractor regularly performs ALDOT work and complied with the requirements. The City has updated its procedures to independently verify inclusion of all required federal compliance provisions going forward.