Audit 405966

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$2.50M
Findings
15
Programs
2
Organization: Sadd, Inc. (DC)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1221685 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221686 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221687 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221688 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221689 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221690 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221691 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221692 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221693 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221694 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221695 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221696 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221697 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221698 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB
1221699 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZQSTYMX5YJ98 Jessica Hugdahl Auditee
5084813568 Amy Boland Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the Federal award activity of the Organization under programs of the Federal Government for the year ended September 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization; accordingly, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets (deficit) or cash flows of the Organization
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Organization has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance for all awards that do not explicitly state that indirect costs are not allowed.
The programs under Assistance Listing Numbers 20.600 and 20.616 are part of the Highway Safety Cluster. There were no other programs under this cluster for the year ended September 30, 2025.

Finding Details

Finding 2025-001: Lack of Supervisory Approval Over Employee Timesheets (Significant Deficiency) Federal Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Programs: State and Community Highway Safety and National Priority Safety Program Assistance Listing Number(s): 20.600 / 20.616 Pass-Through Entity Name(s): Various Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR §200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Such records should be reviewed and approved by a responsible supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the work performed. Condition: During our testing of payroll transactions, we noted that a sample of employee timesheets charged to Federal awards did not evidence documented supervisory review or approval. In these instances, while the timesheets were prepared by employees, there was no indication that a supervisor reviewed and approved the recorded hours prior to payroll processing or cost allocation. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate procedures or controls in place to ensure that all employee timesheets were consistently reviewed and approved by supervisory personnel. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documented supervisory approval, there is an increased risk that payroll costs charged to Federal awards may not be accurate, properly supported, or allowable. This deficiency could result in questioned costs and noncompliance with Federal regulations governing compensation charged to awards Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: During our testing of payroll, we selected a sample of 40 employee timesheets for the period under audit. Of the items tested, 9 timesheets lacked evidence of supervisory review and approval. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement and enforce a policy requiring documented supervisory review and approval of all employee timesheets prior to payroll processing. Procedures should include periodic monitoring to ensure compliance with this requirement.