Audit 405050

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$2.00M
Findings
1
Programs
7
Organization: Disability Rights Mississippi (MS)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
JVG9W1DLWFG5 Beverly Sheriff Auditee
6019680600 Matthew Turnage Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Organization under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2025. The schedule is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.

Finding Details

Condition: An instance in which a case was incorrectly coded to the grant under audit. Upon further review, the case file did not contain sufficient supporting documentation in the DAD system to substantiate eligibility under the audited grant. Although the misclassification to the incorrect grant code was identified, required eligibility documentation supporting the case’s inclusion under any applicable grant was not maintained in the system. Criteria: Eligibility for participation in the program requires the Organization to maintain complete and accurate client files in accordance with state requirements. The state provides a prescribed list of documentation that must be obtained and retained prior to determining eligibility and disbursing federal commodities. Cause: The Organization has established procedures intended to ensure the completeness of case files, including a process to verify receipt of all required documentation during the application and approval process. However, in this instance, the established procedures were not effectively followed, resulting in improper grant coding and incomplete documentation within the DAD system. Effect: Case files cannot be considered complete or compliant with program requirements when required eligibility documentation is missing or when cases are improperly coded to a grant for which eligibility cannot be supported. As a result, there is an increased risk that program benefits may be provided to ineligible individuals or charged to an incorrect funding source. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its review procedures to ensure cases are accurately coded to the appropriate grant and all required eligibility documentation is obtained, reviewed, and maintained in the DAD system. Additionally, we recommend that periodic (at least quarterly) reviews of client files be performed to verify ongoing compliance with state documentation and grant eligibility requirements and that missing documentation be obtained and retained where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding and plans to enhance its review of case files to ensure that each file contains the required eligibility documentation and is properly coded to the appropriate grant. Management also plans to reinforce procedures to prevent similar issues in the future.