Audit 403811

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$8.12M
Findings
2
Programs
15
Organization: Southeast, Inc. and Affiliates (OH)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1217655 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes N
1217656 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
P5BHFRA5ZXA9 Charles Tong Auditee
6148130177 Wes Ernst Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The federal loan programs listed subsequently are administered directly by the Organization, and balances and transactions relating to these programs are included in the Organization’s basic financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2025, consists of: Assistance Listing Number - 14.157; Program Name - FHA Project Number 043-EH219; Outstanding Balance at June 30, 2025 - $75,243

Finding Details

Information on the Federal Program - Assistance Listing Number 93.224, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS22681 for project periods June 1, 2023 through May 31, 2025. Criteria or Specific Requirement - Health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.3032 through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – During our review of the Organization’s sliding fee calculations, we noted 5 patient encounters with incorrectly calculated sliding fee adjustments. We also noted improper write-off adjustments coded as sliding fee adjustments. Cause - Various adjustments, including the sliding fee, were not applied appropriately due to incorrect inputs in the Organization’s system. Effect or Potential Effect - The sliding fee adjustments were not appropriately applied. Questioned costs - Not applicable Context - Out of a population of 596 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments was tested. Out of the 25 tested, all the selections included a write-off adjustment that was inappropriately coded as a sliding fee adjustment. Additionally, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Health Center’s approved sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A nonstatistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Is a repeat finding (2024-002). Recommendation - We recommend that the Organization implement a review process for sliding fee and other adjustments applied in the billing system, including review for the sliding fee application and relating supporting documents. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management has already begun to implement corrective actions to strengthen compliance with HRSA Sliding Fee Discount Program requirements. Corrective measures include updating sliding fee procedures, annual staff training, monthly quality assurance reviews, and ongoing management oversight of sliding fee adjustments and supporting documentation.
Information on the Federal Program - Assistance Listing Number 93.224, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS22681 for project periods June 1, 2023 through May 31, 2025. Criteria or Specific Requirement - Health centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization reported an inaccurate amount within Table 9E, Line 1g, Column a on its Uniform Data System (UDS) report. Cause – Internal controls were not in place to ensure proper reporting of data within the UDS report. Effect or Potential Effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs - None Context – Only 1 special report was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS). Identification as a Repeat Finding – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management is implementing additional review and validation procedures for UDS reporting. Corrective actions include formal UDS preparation and review protocols, standardized validation checklists, retention of supporting documentation, and annual training for personnel responsible for preparing and reviewing HRSA reports.