FAC Explorer

Audit 403455

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$4.56M
Findings
4
Programs
8
Organization: Safehaven of Tarrant County (TX)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-10
Auditor: SUTTON FROST CARY LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1217291 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1217292 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes H
1217293 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes H
1217294 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes H

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
16.575 CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE $2.16M Yes 1
93.496 FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SERVICES/CULTURALLY SPECIFIC DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SERVICES $224,505 Yes 0
16.736 TRANSITIONAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DATING VIOLENCE, STALKING, OR SEXUAL ASSAULT $203,789 Yes 0
93.671 FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SERVICES/DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES $160,247 Yes 0
14.267 CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM $141,733 Yes 1
14.231 EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM $120,673 Yes 0
14.218 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTS $42,000 Yes 0
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $22,826 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
UHUERV1MAJ98 Liz Tumlinson Auditee
6823181824 Brian Razloznik Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (Schedule) includes the federal and state grant activity of SafeHaven of Tarrant County dba The Archway (Organization). The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and the Texas Grant Management Standards (TxGMS). Because the Schedule only presents a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended and does not present the financial position, changes in net asset, or cash flows of the Organization.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles in the Uniform Guidance or the TxGMS, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Organization elected to use the de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2025-001
Finding 2025-001: Reporting – material weakness in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Crime Victim Assistance ALN 16.575 Criteria: The Organization’s internal control procedures over the control environment and monitoring includes comparing the internal reports and participant data to ensure they agree to performance reports submitted to the grantor. Condition: Internal control process could not be tested and the number of participants did not agree to underlying records, which was overstated by 43 participants. Cause: Reperformance of approval process not possible, grant manager prepares report, Chief Operating Officer reviews and submits report but no audit trail supports process. Effect: Internal controls were not adequately designed and implemented to prevent or detect and correct errors. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: In order to comply with the Uniform Guidance federal regulations, we recommend that a reconciliation take place monthly to ensure the number of participants agrees to the supporting documentation and establish more robust control procedures that are documented and re-performable. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan.
Finding 2025-003
Finding 2025-003: Period of Performance – significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Continuum of Care Program – 14.267 Criteria: The Organization’s internal control over compliance is to review all expenses to ensure they are charged to the correct grant period. Condition: During period of performance testing for federal grants, for 1 of the 25 transactions, the payroll expense was charged to the wrong grant period. Cause: The control did not identify the billing error. Effect: The Organization charged the wrong grant period. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: In order to comply with the Uniform Guidance federal regulations, we recommend a review process be updated so that expenses charged to the grant are aligned with the grant period. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan.