Audit 403433

FY End
2025-04-30
Total Expended
$935,330
Findings
3
Programs
3
Organization: CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS (IL)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-10
Auditor: ECCEZION

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1217277 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1217278 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1217279 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION $760,621 Yes 2
97.047 BRIC: BUILDING RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITIES $146,037 Yes 1
16.835 BODY WORN CAMERA POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION $28,672 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZX3JR3R54LH3 Cheri Grieco Auditee
8473986070 Cheryden Juergensen Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal award activity of City of Prospect Heights under programs of the federal government for the year ended April 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in and used in the preparation of the basic financial statements.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
The City has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
The City did not provide federal awards to subrecipients during the year ended April 30, 2025.
There were no federal loans or loan guarantees outstanding at year end.
The City did not receive federally donated PPE as of April 30, 2025.

Finding Details

FINDING NUMBER: 2025-001 Criteria or specific requirement: Management is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of all financial records. This includes having controls over grant-funded capital projects process which serve to prevent and detect errors in grant expenditure reporting that ensure that the financial statements and grant reports are free of material misstatements. Condition: During the audit, we noted that communication between the City’s finance department and engineers or other City staff responsible for managing grants and capital projects is not consistently formalized. Context: Some engineering and other project-related costs associated with construction-in-progress (CIP) projects were not consistently accumulated as part of the total project cost. Also, this has, at times, resulted in delays in obtaining complete project and grant information, the need for corrections to grant tracking documentation, and challenges reconciling grant expenditures to the City’s accounting records. Effect: There is an increase risk that: 1.) capital assets and construction in progress are understated due to incomplete accumulation of project related costs, 2.) grant expenditures reported to granting agencies do not reconcile to the City’s accounting records, and 3.) errors or omissions related to grant compliance and financial reporting may not be identified timely. Cause: These issues appear to stem from reliance on invoice-level capitalization thresholds rather than a project-based review of capital activity, as well as the absence of a formal process for ongoing communication and reconciliation between the finance department and personnel responsible for managing capital and grant-funded projects. Recommendation: The City should enhance its project‑level oversight by encouraging periodic coordination between the finance department, engineers, and other City staff involved in grant‑funded projects. At year end, we recommend meeting with project and grant administrators to identify reimbursable expenditures incurred but not yet received, so that grant receivables and related revenues are accurately reflected in the City’s financial statements. Management’s response: Management is committed to strengthening coordination and oversight of the City’s grant-funded capital projects through centralizing project tracking via grant/project management software, implementing rigorous compliance monitoring, and improving intradepartmental communication. By centralizing our grants through the course of their lifespans, we intend to better track the progress of our grant projects and budgets and with the inclusion of grant document storage, to enhance compliance across departments. We will also designate coordination teams consisting of liaisons across administration, finance, engineering, public works, and grant writers to ensure internal alignment.
FINDING NUMBER: 2025-002 Criteria or specific requirement: Management is responsible for ensuring compliance with wage rate requirements for contractors and subcontractors. Condition: During the audit, the City did not verify that the contractor or subcontractor submitted the required certified payrolls for work performed under the federally assisted construction contract. As a result, the City did not maintain or review sufficient documentation to demonstrate compliance with wage rate requirements for all applicable weeks during the audit period. Context: Certified payrolls were not obtained and reviewed to ensure compliance with wage rate requirements for all contractors and subcontractors. Effect: The City could not demonstrate compliance with wage rate requirements, increasing the risk that prevailing wage violations could occur and not be detected. Cause: Controls were not in place or were not operating effectively, to ensure required certified payrolls were obtained, reviewed, and retained. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement procedures to ensure compliance with wage rate requirements for all applicable federally assisted construction contracts. At a minimum, the City should: 1.) Require the contractor or subcontractor to submit certified payrolls for each week in which covered work is performed, 2.) Designate responsible personnel to verify receipt of certified payrolls before processing or approving related payment requests, 3.) Document the review performed, including evidence that weekly certified payrolls were received and examined for completeness, 4.) Retain certified payroll documentation and related review evidence in the grant or contract file, and 5.) Establish a monitoring control to confirm that all applicable weeks and all contractors/subcontractors are covered. Management’s response: The City recognizes the need to improve internal controls related to grant disbursements for labor provided by our contractors. The project this past year included participation from multiple federal funding agencies and payments by the City as well as direct payments to contractors by the funding agencies. We have already added additional procedures and checkpoints to provide for adequate documentation related to certified payrolls. In addition, the City is planning to procure a grant tracking system to automate tracking the details for every project.