Audit 403181

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$21.72M
Findings
3
Programs
10
Organization: City of Harrisburg (PA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2026-06-05

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1216736 2023-003 Material Weakness Yes F
1216737 2023-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1216738 2023-004 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
E4KUXKHG38V4 Bryan McCutcheon Auditee
7172556434 Matthew Wildasin Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the primary government of the City of Harrisburg (City), Pennsylvania for the year ended December 31, 2023. The City’s reporting entity is defined in Note 1(a) to the City’s basic financial statements. Federal awards expended directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through other government agencies are included on the Schedule.
The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the City’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The City has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
he City entered into various promissory notes under Section 108 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-383), as amended. The proceeds from the notes were to administer acquisition, relocation, clearance, rehabilitation, and disposition of City properties. These notes do not have continuing compliance requirements. As collateral, the City pledged all grants approved or for which the City may become eligible under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and program income derived from disposition by sale or lease of any real property to the extent acquired or rehabilitated with the guaranteed loan funds, including any interest earned on such disposition proceeds. Interest payments are required to be made to the Federal Financing Bank on the daily unpaid principal balances. The composition of promissory notes outstanding under Section 108 at December 31, 2023, is as follows: Section 108 loans changed during the year as follows: Original Date of Note: September 14, 2006, refinanced to 2019A Amount of Note: $ 3,795,000 Interest Rate: 2.55% - 2.86% Required Interest Payment: Semi-Annual, Feb 1 & Aug 1 Principal Balance 12/31/2023: $ 645,000 2023 Principal Payments: $ 210,000 Section 108 loans changed during the year as follows: Beginning of Year - $ 855,000 Additions - $0 Payments - $ (210,000) End of Year - $ 645,000

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Community Development Block Grants/ Entitlement Grants Cluster (ALN #14.218) Condition: During the audit, it was noted that the City was not conducting an inventory of equipment and real property purchased with CDBG grants funds. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations [2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1) and 200.313(d)(2)] requires equipment and real property records must be maintained that include a description of the property or equipment, a serial or identification number (if applicable), the source of funding, acquisition date, cost of the property or equipment, location, and condition. In addition, the Code of Federal Regulations requires that a physical inventory of equipment and real property must be taken, and the results reconciled with the records at least once every two years. Cause: The City does not have controls in place to ensure that an inventory of equipment and real property purchased with grant funds is being conducted and maintained. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the Equipment and Real Property federal requirements. Failure to comply with grant award requirements could jeopardize future funding. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendations: We recommend that the City implement procedures to ensure that all federal equipment and real property requirements are followed, including maintaining an accurate and complete listing of equipment and real property purchased with grant funds and conducting an inventory on those items at least every two years. Views of Responsible Officials: Expenditures of CDBG grant funding for capital outlays on equipment and real property are readily identifiable within the City’s fixed assets module of the accounting system, including subsequent retirements of any such capital assets. The Department acknowledges related physical inventory observations to identify these assets have not been actively performed and will work to formalize such inventory procedures. The City will look to complete such process internally as soon as possible.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster & Lead Hazard Reduction Grant Program (ALN #14.218 & 14.905) Condition: The annual audit and data collection form submission are being filed after the regulatory deadlines. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR section 200.512(a)(1) requires that the annual audit and data collection form be submitted no later than 9 months after the end of the audit period. Cause: The City does not have controls in place to ensure that it is adhering to the timelines established in the Code of Federal Regulation. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the Report submission requirements. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendations: We recommend that the City implement procedures to ensure that the audit reports are filed within the regulatory deadlines. Views of Responsible Officials: The planned audit timeline was impacted by ongoing functional issues of the newer ERP City-wide financial management system, expanded managerial budget and related project supporting work asked of the Accounting Manager, and recent occurring vacancies in key financial managerial positions. The Accounting Manager will continue to work and strategize for improved efficiency in the performance of future audit preparation work.