Audit 402993

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$53.76M
Findings
1
Programs
4
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-03

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1216501 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E

Contacts

Name Title Type
XFWFR56G11Y1 Brian Donnelly Auditee
7024739400 Brian Hardy Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Las Vegas – Clark County Urban League (Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Organization. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Indirect Cost Rate For the year ended June 30, 2025, the Organization has established indirect cost rates with the federal agencies associated with its respective grants and did not elect to use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate. These established rates range from 8% to 10%.
Effective July 2025, the Organization’s participation in the Child Care and Development (CCDF) program concluded when the State of Nevada assumed direct responsibility for administration of the program. Federal expenditures related to this program totaled approximately $52.2 million and $134.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Organization continues to administer other programs, including the federally funded Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).

Finding Details

Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302(a) and 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must maintain adequate records supporting Federal program transactions and implement internal controls to ensure compliance. The OMB Compliance Supplement (2025), Part 4 – HHS, for the CCDF program requires documentation supporting eligibility determinations, including documentation to support applicable health and safety standards, and maintain compliance to remain eligible for payment. Condition: During testing, the Organization was unable to provide required eligibility documentation for four children, representing two unique families. In addition, two providers were noted who were deficient in meeting the health and safety requirements of the Program and were subsequently terminated as participating providers. Despite the termination status, these providers later received additional program payments. The Organization was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that the providers corrected deficiencies or were re-approved prior to receiving subsequent payments. Because supporting documentation was not retained, we could not determine whether the providers met requirements to resume participation. The Organization explained that eligibility and health and safety documentation historically resided within a system of record that has been transferred entirely to the State following a transition of the program’s administration to the State. The Organization no longer retains access to that system or copies of all documentation contained therein. Cause: As part of the transition of program responsibilities back to the State, the Organization returned program records and no longer retained access to the State-managed system that housed eligibility information. The Organization did not maintain its own copies of all eligibility or health and safety documentation needed to support future audits. Effect: The Organization cannot demonstrate compliance with Federal eligibility documentation requirements for the affected participants. In addition, the Organization could not demonstrate that payments totaling $34,018 were made to providers who met health and safety requirements of the Program at the time services were delivered. These costs are considered questioned due to lack of supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: $34,018 Recommendations: The Organization should establish procedures to ensure eligibility documentation is retained by the Organization, even when a third-party system serves as the primary repository. Future programs should include a documented record-retention plan ensuring audit-ready records remain accessible.