Audit 402865

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$38.75M
Findings
6
Programs
9
Organization: Presbyterian Medical Services (NM)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-06-02
Auditor: REDW LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1216343 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1216344 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1216345 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1216346 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1216347 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1216348 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
N21LDNMNKSW9 Denise Cantu Auditee
5054432567 Steven Purwin Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) presents the federal award activity of Presbyterian Medical Services and Subsidiary (collectively, “PMS”) under programs with the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2025. PMS’ reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to PMS’ consolidated financial statements. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of PMS, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of PMS.
The Schedule is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. PMS receives certain direct reimbursement revenue from federal agencies under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which are not subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and are not presented in the accompanying Schedule.
PMS negotiates an indirect cost rate with the federal government. Accordingly, PMS has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
The federal granting agency is responsible for providing PMS with the federal Assistance Listing Number for each grant or contract. In cases where the federal granting agency did not provide the Assistance Listing Number to PMS, other available identifying numbers are presented on the Schedule.
The following is a reconciliation of the expenses reported on the Schedule to the revenues reported in the consolidated statement of activities for the year ended December 31, 2025: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table

Finding Details

2025-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Sliding Scale – Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title: Health Center Program Cluster Assistance listing numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Award year and number: 2025; 6 H80CS00205‐24‐08; 4 H8NCS53926-01-02; 6 H2ECS45598-02-03; 5 H8KCS49758-02-00; 1 Q8JCS54522-01-00 Criteria: According to 42 USC 254(k)(3)(E), (F), and (G) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) regulations, health centers are required to develop and implement a sliding fee discount schedule that adjusts service charges for eligible patients in accordance with their ability to pay. Condition: Documentation supporting income verification for eligible patients was obtained and maintained in patient files; however, income frequency entered into the software by customer access representatives (CARs) was not always consistent with the frequency reflected on the supporting documentation. As a result, income amounts were incorrectly calculated by the system and did not agree to the amounts that should have been used to determine eligibility and apply the sliding fee discount schedule. Specifically, income documented as weekly, biweekly, bimonthly, monthly, or annual was in some instances entered under an incorrect pay frequency, resulting in miscalculated annualized income and the application of an incorrect sliding fee discount. In addition family size was entered incorrectly in the system for one patient, which resulted in the patient being placed in the wrong sliding fee discount category. Known Questioned Costs Exceeding $25,000: None. Context: Of a sample of 25 patients who received sliding fee discounts, four had documentation of income that was inaccurately computed when determining their applicable sliding fee discount. Of the same sample of 25 patients, one additional patient had an inaccurate family size used when determining the sliding fee discount. Cause and Effect: Patient income and family size information entered into the system used to calculate annual income and determine the applicable sliding fee discount was not always recorded accurately. These errors were attributable to human error during the data entry and eligibility determination process. As a result, sliding fee discounts were calculated using inaccurate household income or family size information, which could cause patients to receive discounts for which they do not qualify. This increases the risk of lost program revenue and noncompliance with HRSA sliding fee discount requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from prior year. This was reported as finding 2024-001 in the 2024 report. Recommendation: We recommend management strengthen controls over the sliding fee discount program by implementing technology-based validation and documentation procedures, along with enhanced staff training and continued internal audits. Specifically, PMS should utilize system controls that flag incomplete and incorrect amounts before a sliding fee discount can be approved. In addition, management should provide formal initial and refresher training to staff responsible for determining eligibility, with emphasis on HRSA sliding fee discount requirements and proper inputs of household income and family size. Management should also consider supervisory review and continue performing periodic quality control testing of sliding fee discount determinations to ensure compliance and reduce the risk of errors resulting from staff turnover. Management’s Response: Management has taken corrective action to strengthen compliance with Sliding Fee Discount Program requirements. Actions include targeted staff training, revisions to patient intake forms to standardize income calculations, and implementation of monthly audits throughout 2026. Clinics with error rates of 10% or higher are subject to focused retraining and continued monitoring. Audit results are reported to leadership to support accountability, and two mandatory training sessions for CARs, AR staff, and administrators are being conducted to reinforce consistent and compliant implementation.