Audit 402270

FY End
2025-08-31
Total Expended
$5.08M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-05-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1215587 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E
1215588 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.569 COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT $400,255 Yes 0
81.042 WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE FOR LOW-INCOME PERSONS $278,161 Yes 0
93.568 LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE $36,911 Yes 0
14.169 HOUSING COUNSELING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $8,899 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
KJ1KJ9J1MUD1 Isaiah Scott Auditee
2567041644 Ebony O'Brien Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards, the “Schedule” includes the federal grant activity of Community Action Partnership of Huntsville/Madison & Limestone Counties, Inc. ("the Agency"), and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Uniform Guidance, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Huntsville/Madison & Limestone, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Agency.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
The Agency has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Agency has elected to use a cost allocation plan.

Finding Details

Condition: During testing of 91 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) participant files, we identified 11 files for which internal controls over compliance with major program requirements were not operating effectively, as follows: Nine (9) files did not include evidence of management review (i.e., a management signature or initials on the application). One (1) file was missing the utility bill from the hard-copy file maintained at the Agency; however, the Agency had submitted the eligibility documentation in FACSPro. One (1) file was missing income verification for the head of household and a social security card for one household member from the hard-copy file maintained at the Agency; however, the Agency had submitted the eligibility documentation in FACSPro. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303 and LIHEAP program requirements, recipients must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that assistance is awarded only to eligible households. Eligibility determinations must be supported by complete and adequate documentation. The Agency’s policies require that each LIHEAP applicant folder include a hard copy of the documents used to determine eligibility that is maintained at the Agency. In addition, all applications must receive a secondary review by management. This review must be documented by the reviewer’s initials or signature on the application. Cause: The exceptions noted resulted from management not consistently adhering to the Agency’s established policies regarding documentation retention and documented management review of LIHEAP applications. Effect: Failure to consistently document and review LIHEAP applications increases the risk that assistance may be awarded to ineligible households. This could result in questioned costs and noncompliance with applicable federal requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management consistently follow Agency policy by ensuring that (1) all LIHEAP applicant files maintained at the Agency are complete and include the documentation used to support eligibility and (2) all applications receive a management review that is clearly documented through reviewer initials or signatures. View of Responsible Officials: See auditee prepared Corrective Action Plan