Audit 401683

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$2.40M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Organization: City of Sergeant Bluff, Iowa (IA)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-05-19

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1214916 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes B
1214917 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes B

Contacts

Name Title Type
HKWLVRMLW633 Aaron Lincoln Auditee
7129434244 Jolynn Hindt Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the City of Sergeant Bluff under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City of Sergeant Bluff, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in financial position, or cash flows of the City of Sergeant Bluff.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
The City of Sergeant Bluff has not elected to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires the City to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance for federal awards, including controls to reasonably ensure that costs charged to federal programs are allowable, properly supported, and comply with applicable federal requirements and the terms and conditions of the award. Under 2 CFR 200.403, costs charged to a federal award must be allowable, including that they be adequately documented and not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing requirements of any other federally financed program in the current or a prior period. Condition: The City did not have adequately designed and implemented review controls over certain material project costs included in reimbursement requests submitted to the pass through agency. Our testing identified that the city submitted the same eligible project cost for reimbursement under two different federal grant awards, of which one was denied for reimbursement Cause: The City lacked sufficiently designed or effectively operating controls over the preparation, review, and approval of reimbursement requests for federal awards. In particular, the City’s controls did not include an effective reconciliation of expenditure detail by invoice, pay application, or other unique transaction identifier across open grant awards before submission of reimbursement requests. Effect: The absence of effective review controls over material project costs increases the risk that ineligible, unsupported, or incorrectly costs could be included in reimbursement requests without timely detection and correction. The duplicate submission was not reimbursed from both federal awards and therefore does not require repayment or adjustment of reimbursement requests. This deficiency is considered a material weakness in internal control over compliance for the Department of Transportation program.