Audit 401322

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$1.14M
Findings
1
Programs
13
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-05-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1214630 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
WMJKDHNFZNM8 Corrina Guardipee-Hall Auditee
9286334101 Richard Gillespie Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the District's federal grant activity for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the District.
Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements.
The program titles and Federal Assistance Listings numbers were obtained from the federal or passthrough grantor or the 2025 Federal Assistance Listings. When no Federal Assistance Listings number had been assigned to a program, the 2-digit federal agency identifier and the federal contract number were used. When there was no federal contract number, the 2-digit federal agency identifier and the word “unknown” were used.
The District did not elect to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as covered in 2 CFR §200.414. The District used an indirect cost rate that was approved by the Arizona Department of Education.

Finding Details

Program: Education Stabilization Fund Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Cochise County, Arizona Grantor Number: Not applicable Questioned Costs: $-0- Type of Finding: Noncompliance (Other Matter), significant deficiency in internal control Compliance Requirement: N. Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Requirements Condition/Context: During our testing of the one contractor funded under the Education Stabilization Fund program, we noted that the District did not obtain or review certified payroll reports from contractors to verify compliance with federal prevailing wage requirements. As a result, the District could not demonstrate that contractors complied with required wage provisions for the sampled projects. Criteria or Specific Requirement: Federal regulations require that contractors and subcontractors performing work on federally funded construction projects pay laborers and mechanics wages at rates not less than those prevailing on similar projects in the locality. These requirements are established under the Davis-Bacon Act and incorporated into federal grant compliance requirements under 2 CFR Part 200. Adequate monitoring of compliance with these wage requirements is required to ensure that workers are being paid correctly per 29 CFR 5.5 compliance provisions. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Cause: The district did not have established procedures to ensure that certified payroll documentation was obtained and reviewed for federally funded construction projects. District personnel were not aware that federal wage requirements applied to the project. Effect: Failure to ensure compliance with federal prevailing wage requirements may result in laborers and mechanics being paid less than required wage rates. This noncompliance could result in questioned costs, repayment of federal funds, or other sanctions by the awarding agency. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement policies and procedures to ensure effective monitoring of compliance with Federal wage rate requirements. This includes obtaining required wage determinations prior to project commencement, including wage requirements in contract documents, and collecting certified payroll reports from contractors. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with this recommendation and will review its procedures over monitoring of wage rate requirements under the Davis Bacon Act.