Audit 4011

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.20M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: Claremont Lincoln University (CA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-11-22
Auditor: Moss Adams LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
2341 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
578783 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $1.19M Yes 1
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $10,004 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MYXHXNFTFDL1 Mark Mendoza Auditee
9096674494 Matt Parsons Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 – Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of Claremont Lincoln University (the “University”) under programs of the federal government for the six-month period ended June 30, 2023. The University amended its year from December 31 to June 30 in 2023 to better align its operations with that of instruction periods offered to students. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University.

Finding Details

FINDING 2023-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table) Criteria – The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education’s (ED’s) centralized database for students’ enrollment information. It is the University’s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status of a student that has received federal aid changes. 34 CFR section 685.309(b)(2): Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that 1. a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a halftime basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or 2. A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition/context – From a system generated population of 144 students who received federal aid and either graduated, withdrew, or dropped during the six-month period ended June 30, 2023, we selected a sample of 20 students. The enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University’s records were compared to the information reported to NSLDS in order to determine if status changes were reported accurately and within the required timeframes. Of the 20 students who graduated or withdrew, 14 were not reported to the NSLDS within the required timeframe, 10 had an incorrect effective date reported to the NSLDS, and 2 had an incorrect status reported to the NSLDS. Cause – Although the University maintains well documented records regarding enrollment status changes, the University did not always have a process in place to ensure that NSLDS records were being updated routinely after a change. The University has historically not used a clearinghouse or other service for reporting changes, and instead, has relied on manual entries to make updates. Effect – The NSLDS database did not include all accurate information in the timeframe required by ED. This information is utilized by ED, the Direct Loan program, lenders, and other institutions to determine in school status, deferment, and grace periods of student loans. Incorrect information could result in incorrect deferment, grace periods, billing, and repayment of student loans. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend the University institute a process and control to ensure student enrollment information reflected in NSLDS is in agreement with University records. This may include a checklist that is followed after an enrollment status change occurs, along with scheduled reminders to submit the changes. Another option would be to ensure that on a monthly or biweekly basis, review all students with known status changes to ensure that updates have been made, or enlist the support of a third party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management agrees with the recommendation and has developed a corrective action plan to address the finding.
FINDING 2023-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table) Criteria – The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education’s (ED’s) centralized database for students’ enrollment information. It is the University’s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status of a student that has received federal aid changes. 34 CFR section 685.309(b)(2): Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that 1. a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a halftime basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or 2. A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition/context – From a system generated population of 144 students who received federal aid and either graduated, withdrew, or dropped during the six-month period ended June 30, 2023, we selected a sample of 20 students. The enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University’s records were compared to the information reported to NSLDS in order to determine if status changes were reported accurately and within the required timeframes. Of the 20 students who graduated or withdrew, 14 were not reported to the NSLDS within the required timeframe, 10 had an incorrect effective date reported to the NSLDS, and 2 had an incorrect status reported to the NSLDS. Cause – Although the University maintains well documented records regarding enrollment status changes, the University did not always have a process in place to ensure that NSLDS records were being updated routinely after a change. The University has historically not used a clearinghouse or other service for reporting changes, and instead, has relied on manual entries to make updates. Effect – The NSLDS database did not include all accurate information in the timeframe required by ED. This information is utilized by ED, the Direct Loan program, lenders, and other institutions to determine in school status, deferment, and grace periods of student loans. Incorrect information could result in incorrect deferment, grace periods, billing, and repayment of student loans. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend the University institute a process and control to ensure student enrollment information reflected in NSLDS is in agreement with University records. This may include a checklist that is followed after an enrollment status change occurs, along with scheduled reminders to submit the changes. Another option would be to ensure that on a monthly or biweekly basis, review all students with known status changes to ensure that updates have been made, or enlist the support of a third party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management agrees with the recommendation and has developed a corrective action plan to address the finding.