Audit 400574

FY End
2021-12-31
Total Expended
$1.79M
Findings
1
Programs
3
Organization: City of Soap Lake (WA)
Year: 2021 Accepted: 2026-05-04

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1213652 2021-002 Material Weakness Yes ABI

Contacts

Name Title Type
E68CBN4L1AD1 Peter Sharp Auditee
5092461211 Jake Santistevan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The amounts shown as current year expenditures represent only the federal grant portion of the program costs. Entire program costs, including the City of Soap Lake’s portion, are more than shown. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in the OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
The City of Soap Lake was approved by the USDA Rural Utilities Service to receive a loan totaling $3,880,000 for Sewer System Improvements and $2,385,000 for Water System Improvements. The amount listed for this loan includes the beginning of the period loan balance plus proceeds used during the year. The balance owing at the end of the period is $5,461,799 in two loans Interim Financing $3,076,799 and USDA 12 $2,385,000. The current and prior year loan balances are reported on the City’s Schedule of Liabilities.

Finding Details

The City did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with procurement requirements and charged expenditures that lacked support for the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities program. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.760, Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal Grantor Name: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $47,764 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes for Procurement, Finding 2020-002 Background The Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities program is designed to assist rural communities in obtaining safe drinking water and adequate waste disposal facilities, which are prerequisites for economic growth. During fiscal year 2021, the City spent $1,669,307 in loan and grant funds awarded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service. The City used this program funding for its water and sewer improvement projects. Federal regulations require recipients to establish, document and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Procurement Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds. Federal regulations also require recipients to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of employees engaged in selecting, awarding or administering contracts with federal funds. Allowable Costs Federal regulations establish principles and standards for determining allowable direct and indirect costs for federal awards. All costs that recipients charge to the program must comply with program requirements and recipients must support this compliance with proper documentation that demonstrates costs are allowable. Description of Condition Procurement Our audit found the District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not establish written procurement procedures and standards of conduct that conform to Uniform Guidance requirements, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Allowable Costs Although the City’s internal controls were adequate for ensuring it materially complied with the program’s allowable activities and costs requirements, the City charged the program for costs that did not have support. Cause of Condition Procurement The City typically does not receive a federal grant compliance audit, and staff and management did not know about the requirements to update the City’s written procurement policies and procedures to comply with federal regulations and establish written standards of conduct until our previous audit that was issued in May 2023. Allowable Costs The City has experienced staff turnover since it charged these costs to the program. Current staff and officials from the granting agency could not locate support for these costs during the audit. Effect of Condition and Questioned Costs Procurement Although the City’s policies did not conform to Uniform Guidance, we found the City complied with federal requirements for competitive solicitation of public works contractors in the project tested. However, without written procurement procedures, the City is at an increased risk of not complying with the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement methods and standards of conduct requirements when using federal funds. Allowable Costs The City charged two expenditures to the program, totaling $47,764, for professional services and other service fees that lacked support. By not retaining support for these expenditures, the City cannot demonstrate the costs were allowable. As a result, we are questioning these costs. Federal regulations require the State Auditor’s Office to report known questioned costs that are more than $25,000 for each type of compliance requirement. We question costs when we find the City has not complied with grant regulations and/or when it does not have adequate documentation to support expenditures. Recommendation Procurement We recommend the City establish written procurement and standards of conduct procedures that conform to federal procurement standards in Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.318-327). Allowable Costs We recommend the City ensure all costs it charges to federal programs are allowable and comply with cost principles, and retain support for all costs charged to the programs. We further recommend the City consult with the grantor to determine whether it needs to repay the questioned costs. City’s Response City’s Response: The City acknowledges the finding regarding unsupported charges to the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities program. We recognize that inadequate procurement controls contributed to this finding. In response, we are implementing comprehensive procedures to ensure that all federal grant expenditures are adequately documented and comply with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. This includes establishing formal procurement policies aligned with federal requirements, creating pre-approval workflows for all federal grant purchases, implementing supervisory review processes, and developing strengthened document retention protocols for all federal award transactions and supporting procurement documentation. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving the issues noted and we will follow up during the next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318 General procurement standards, establishes requirements for documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local and federal laws and regulations.