Audit 400082

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$8.77M
Findings
1
Programs
10
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-04-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1210790 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E

Contacts

Name Title Type
NPNLQ8JADSW5 Erika Trujillo Auditee
7076430054 Ryan McDonald Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Legal Services of Northern California, Inc. (LSNC) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of LSNC, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of LSNC.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: Legal Services Corporation Federal Program Name: Basic Field Grant Program Assistance Listing Number: 9.805240 Federal Award Identification Year: 2025 Pass-Through Agency: N/A, Direct Award Award Period: 1/1/25-12/31/25 Compliance Requirement Affected: Section 1611 Financial Eligibility Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Each recipient is required to establish a maximum annual income level for persons to be eligible to receive legal assistance under the LSC Act, which is not to exceed one hundred and twenty-five (125%) of the amounts specified in the current official Federal Poverty Income Guidelines (www.hrsa.gov), (45 C.F.R. § 1611.3(c)(1 )). Condition: During eligibility testing, the auditors identified instances where cases reported as LSC-eligible were not adequately supported by eligibility documentation. In one instance, management indicated the case was incorrectly classified as LSC-eligible, and in another instance, required documentation supporting an asset waiver was not sufficiently maintained. As a result, eligibility determinations for the selected cases were not fully supported in accordance with LSC requirements. Context: The finding arose from a limited number of isolated eligibility documentation issues identified during testing and does not indicate a pervasive breakdown in controls. The exceptions were case-specific and limited in scope relative to the cases reviewed. Accordingly, the prevalence and potential impact of the finding are considered limited. Effect: Failure to consistently document and support eligibility determinations increases the risk that LSC-funded legal assistance may be provided or reported for clients who do not meet eligibility requirements, resulting in noncompliance with LSC regulations and OIG audit requirements. Cause: The condition appears to be caused by a breakdown in controls over case classification and eligibility documentation, including management review of cases reported as LSC-eligible and retention of required documentation supporting asset waivers. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen controls over eligibility determinations by ensuring that all cases classified and reported as LSC-eligible include complete and retained documentation supporting financial eligibility, including income exceptions and asset waivers. Management should also implement periodic reviews of case classifications to ensure that only eligible cases are reported as LSC-funded. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.