Audit 399925

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$19.57M
Findings
1
Programs
12
Organization: Canyon County, Idaho (ID)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-04-28
Auditor: EIDE BAILLY LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1210432 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $19.05M Yes 1
97.067 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM $174,821 Yes 0
16.543 MISSING CHILDREN'S ASSISTANCE $67,483 Yes 0
97.042 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANTS $62,196 Yes 0
97.012 BOATING SAFETY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE $55,557 Yes 0
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $43,975 Yes 0
16.606 STATE CRIMINAL ALIEN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $30,060 Yes 0
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $28,216 Yes 0
20.600 STATE AND COMMUNITY HIGHWAY SAFETY $20,442 Yes 0
16.738 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM $20,153 Yes 0
15.904 HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND GRANTS-IN-AID $10,685 Yes 0
16.609 PROJECT SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS $6,231 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
XN4LDNQN5NW9 Kyle Wilmot Auditee
2084556080 Jodi Daugherty Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of Canyon County under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2025. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Canyon County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, fund balance, or cash flows of Canyon County.
Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No Federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient.
The County does not draw for indirect administrative expenses and has not elected to use the de minimis cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Treasury, Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. 2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.2096 outlines the requirements the non-federal entity verify vendors for which it plans to enter into a covered transaction are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. We noted that while the County does have a purchasing policy, elements as required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. In addition, we noted the County did not retain the supporting documentation indicating they had verified vendors they were entering into covered transactions with were neither suspended nor debarred. The County was made aware that the policy is out of compliance with the Uniform Guidance during the 2024 audit. However, management has not had sufficient time to draft an updated policy in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the County to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test the policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Recommendation: The County should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Additionally, the County should review their checklist and/or document retention requirements for contracts to be sure it includes the support the County verified the vendor was neither suspended nor debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.