Audit 397766

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$3.02M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Organization: City of Satellite Beach (FL)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-04-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1205931 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1205932 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
FY8FJJKKBG83 Nick Walsh Auditee
3217734407 Christine E. Noll-Rhan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) include the federal awards of the City of Satellite Beach, Florida, under programs of the federal government and the State of Florida for the year ended September 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Auditor General. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City of Satellite Beach, Florida, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the City of Satellite Beach, Florida.
The City of Satellite Beach, Florida had no subrecipients in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025.
The City of Satellite Beach, Florida did not receive any noncash assistance during the year ended September 30, 2025.

Finding Details

2025-004 Suspension and Debarment 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds US Department of Treasury Passed through Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2024 Funding Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls. Documentation of the check for suspension or debarment needs to be retained. Condition: Review of checking for suspension and debarment was not done prior to contracting with the vendor. Cause of condition: The City did not consistently complete reviews for all vendors to ensure that the vendors were not suspended and debarred before projects had. Perspective (context): For 5 of the 8 vendors selected, suspension and debarment was not checked prior to paying the vendor. The sample was not statistically valid. Potential effect of condition: Good or services could be contracted with a suspended or debarred vendor, creating questioned costs. Questioned Costs: None noted. Reported finding is a deficiency in internal control. Recommendation: The City should require all vendors to provide certification of their status before a contract or purchase order is completed with the vendor and the City should obtain new certificates annually to ensure the vendors status has not changed. Management’s response on planned corrective action: Management agrees with the recommendation. The City has implemented procedures requiring all departments to obtain vendor certification of status prior to executing a contract or issuing a purchase order. Over the past year, we have worked diligently to educate departments on the importance of obtaining and maintaining proper vendor certifications to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. We will continue to reinforce this expectation and monitor compliance, including obtaining updated certifications annually to ensure vendor status has not changed.
2025-005 Lack of Report Review 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds US Department of Treasury 2021 Funding Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls. Reports should be subject to independent review to verify completeness, validity and timeliness of submission. Condition: There was no documented review by the City Manager of the annual report submitted to the Us Treasury department prior to submittal. Cause of condition: The annual report to the US Treasury was not reviewed prior to submittal. Perspective (context): The one annual report was not reviewed. Potential effect of condition: Review could contain errors, could be submitted incomplete or late. Questioned Costs: None noted. Reported finding is a deficiency in internal control. Recommendation: The City should have controls in place to ensure all reports are reviewed prior to submittal. Management’s response on planned corrective action: Management agrees that reports should be reviewed prior to submission and notes that the City does have controls in place to ensure appropriate review procedures are performed. In this instance, the report was prepared and submitted by the City Manager, and due to limitations within the Federal Government’s online reporting system, there was not a built-in approval workflow available to document the review process.