Audit 397219

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$5.81M
Findings
1
Programs
11
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1205536 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B

Contacts

Name Title Type
GWYLL6GQJ7D5 William Ludeker Auditee
6318673020 Alan Yu, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

No insurance is carried specifically to cover equipment purchased with federal funds. Equipment purchased with federal funds that is inventoried is covered by the District’s casualty insurance policies. There were no loans or loan guarantees outstanding at year end.
The accompanying Schedule reflects only those expenditures that are subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, and thus excludes certain items reported in the District’s financial statements. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the District reported $301,446 in surplus food commodities received from the federal government as federal sources revenue in its governmental funds financial statements. However, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the value of surplus food commodities used during the fiscal year is required to be reported as federal awards expended. Therefore, an adjustment of $274 for the value of surplus food inventory not used was reflected, resulting in a total of $301,172 reported as non-cash assistance (food distribution) for surplus food commodities used in the National School Lunch Program, ALN: 10.555. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the District received $71,234 in E-Rate funding, which is reported as federal sources revenue in the governmental funds financial statements. However, E-Rate program reimbursements are not classified as federal awards expended in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the District included in the Schedule amounts that were expended in a prior year that were inadvertently not included in the previous year’s schedule. Additionally, for the fiscal year June 30, 2025, there was an immaterial difference between the federal sources revenue reported in the governmental fund financial statements and the Schedule as a result adjustments made during the grant close out process of $224. The following is a reconciliation of the federal revenues reported in the financial statements to federal awards expended, as reported in the Schedule:

Finding Details

Significant Deficiency 2025-001. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles United States Department of Education, Passed Through New York State, Department of Education: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ALN: 84.010A Criteria: Salaries and wages charged to federal awards must be supported by documentation that meets the standards prescribed by the Uniform Guidance Subpart E, 2 CFR §200.430. Condition: Subpart E, 2 CFR §200.430 of the Uniform Guidance requires that charges to “Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed.” The documentation should support the distribution of the employee’s compensation among specific activities if the employee works on more than one federal award, or a federal award and non-federal award. The preparation of personnel activity reports (PAR) or periodic certifications or the equivalent is the most effective way to comply with this requirement. During the current year, the District prepared periodic certification equivalents, but it did not comply with the documentation standards prescribed in Subpart E, 2 CFR §200.430; the amount of one employee’s actual payroll charged to the Title I federal award was less than the allocation percentage on the periodic certification reports that were signed by the employee’s supervisor. Cause: The staff who was responsible for maintaining records that accurately reflect the work performed, as described in Subpart E, 2 CFR §200.430, to support salaries charged to federal awards, prepared semi-annual periodic certification reports using a different full time equivalent (FTE) allocation than what was reflected in the employee’s actual payroll records. The District’s internal procedures did not identify the discrepancy. Effect: Noncompliance could result in the incorrect amount for services rendered being charged to the federal award. Questioned Costs: Dollar amount undetermined. Context: The District maintains time records for employees charged to federal awards using a different FTE allocation than the employee’s actual payroll allocation. A total of 18 employees’ wages were charged to the Title I grant. Audit samples selected based on payroll transactions covered 9 of the employees. Condition was noted on payroll transactions for one of the 9 employees in the audit sample. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The District should revise its procedures to prepare documentation to support actual salaries and wages charged to federal awards after the work was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance at Subpart E, 2 CFR §200.430. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee: The District will adopt procedures to ensure appropriate documentation will be prepared to comply with Subpart E, 2 CFR §200.430.