Criteria: Low Income Energy Assistance Program case records should contain documentation that verifications were done to verify information submitted by applicants and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources identified by applicants should be calculated correctly and agreed back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process that do not agree between the application and the online verification documents should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: Technical errors consisted of three instances of failure to document differences in income reported on the application and income reported through online verification. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs related to those errors. Context: Of 1,731 cases, we examined 40 cases to verify that all required application and verification documentation was in on file. Effect: Three cases did not have adequate documentation on file for verification process. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure that all required application and verification documentation are on file. Workers should be retrained on how to document the process of verifying information submitted on the application and to information discovered through online verifications. In addition to all workers understanding the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree or proper explanation is included. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete reviews for proper report comparations and documentation. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: Three eligibility errors were found. One case contained an unverified social security number. One case contained an income error in which the income entered into NC FAST evidence and used for the eligibility determination did not match the verification of income collected at the time. One case was not properly terminated. Questioned Costs: These errors did affect eligibility, however the $955 in claims paid in error did not rise to the level of a questioned cost. Context: Of 470,631 claims, we examined 120 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2021-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: These technical errors consisted of fifty-six instances of failure to comply with a policy requirement. Of these, twenty-eight failed to run the work number for all individuals with the potential for income. Seven instances of inaccurate resource calculations in NC FAST. All seven errors were the result of evidence entered into NC Fast and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation or lacking any supporting documentation. Eighteen instances of inaccurate budget calculations in NC FAST. All eighteen errors were the result of evidence entered into NC Fast and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation or lacking any supporting documentation. Three instances of evidence input error resulting in each inaccurate needs unit in eligibility determination. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs related to those errors. Context: Of the 470,631 claims, we examined 138 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-001. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Low Income Energy Assistance Program case records should contain documentation that verifications were done to verify information submitted by applicants and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources identified by applicants should be calculated correctly and agreed back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process that do not agree between the application and the online verification documents should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: Technical errors consisted of three instances of failure to document differences in income reported on the application and income reported through online verification. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs related to those errors. Context: Of 1,731 cases, we examined 40 cases to verify that all required application and verification documentation was in on file. Effect: Three cases did not have adequate documentation on file for verification process. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure that all required application and verification documentation are on file. Workers should be retrained on how to document the process of verifying information submitted on the application and to information discovered through online verifications. In addition to all workers understanding the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree or proper explanation is included. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete reviews for proper report comparations and documentation. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: Three eligibility errors were found. One case contained an unverified social security number. One case contained an income error in which the income entered into NC FAST evidence and used for the eligibility determination did not match the verification of income collected at the time. One case was not properly terminated. Questioned Costs: These errors did affect eligibility, however the $955 in claims paid in error did not rise to the level of a questioned cost. Context: Of 470,631 claims, we examined 120 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2021-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: These technical errors consisted of fifty-six instances of failure to comply with a policy requirement. Of these, twenty-eight failed to run the work number for all individuals with the potential for income. Seven instances of inaccurate resource calculations in NC FAST. All seven errors were the result of evidence entered into NC Fast and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation or lacking any supporting documentation. Eighteen instances of inaccurate budget calculations in NC FAST. All eighteen errors were the result of evidence entered into NC Fast and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation or lacking any supporting documentation. Three instances of evidence input error resulting in each inaccurate needs unit in eligibility determination. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs related to those errors. Context: Of the 470,631 claims, we examined 138 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-001. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.