Audit 395209

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$176.19M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1190940 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1190941 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS $171.29M Yes 1
14.879 MAINSTREAM VOUCHERS $4.32M Yes 1
14.896 FAMILY SELF-SUFFICIENCY PROGRAM $552,374 Yes 0
14.856 LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SECTION 8 MODERATE REHABILITATION $25,348 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
VL3GZ3ANH7W4 Mansoorali (ali) Hudda Auditee
5107278521 Sanwar Harshwal Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the County of Alameda under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Housing Authority of the County of Alameda, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of Housing Authority of the County of Alameda
Amounts reported on the Schedule represent expenditures incurred for the Authority’s federal programs, and are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in 2 CFR 200, Subpart E (Cost Principles), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
The Authority neither had an indirect cost rate not used the de minimis 10% of Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC).

Finding Details

Condition: During our testwork over HQS enforcement requirements under the Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8), we selected a sample of 25 failed HQS inspections. We noted that:  For 10 of the sampled units, the Authority did not provide reinspection reports for life-threatening deficiencies.  Additionally, Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) were not abated as required in accordance with the criteria established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Criteria: Under 24 CFR § 982.405(d), PHAs must ensure HQS deficiencies in HAP assisted units are corrected within required timeframes. For life-threatening deficiencies, the PHA must inspect and notify the owner within 24 hours, and the owner must make repairs within 24 hours of notification. For non-life-threatening deficiencies, the PHA must inspect and notify the owner within 15 days, and the owner must correct the deficiency within 30 days or within an approved extension. If an owner fails to correct deficiencies within the required period, the PHA must abate HAP no later than the first of the month following the correction deadline or terminate the HAP contract. Under 24 CFR §§ 982.158(d) and 982.404, for family-caused deficiencies that are not corrected, the PHA must take prompt enforcement action against the family. Cause: Housing Voucher tenant files are not being maintained with complete and accurate information. Information such as documentation to support that HQS deficiencies identified in units under a HAP contract were addressed within the required timeframes were missing from the Housing Voucher Cluster tenant files. Effect: Failure to maintain documentation demonstrating that HQS deficiencies were corrected within required timeframes increases the risk that assisted units may continue to operate with unresolved health and safety issues. Without adequate records, the PHA cannot demonstrate compliance with federal requirements governing the Housing Voucher Cluster program. This may result in participants residing in units that do not meet HUD’s minimum housing quality standards, potential exposure to HUD monitoring findings, and the risk of repayment or other administrative sanctions. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that the PHA strengthen its internal controls and file management procedures to ensure that all documentation related to HQS deficiencies including inspection reports, owner notifications, repair verification, and any HAP abatement actions is consistently maintained in tenant files. The PHA should:  Implement a standardized checklist or documentation protocol for HQS deficiency follow-up.  Provide staff training on required HUD timelines and documentation standards.  Periodically review tenant files to ensure completeness and compliance.