Audit 394478

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$24.95M
Findings
3
Programs
16
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1186739 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1186740 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N
1186741 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
J221RK5FMG94 Richard Jones Auditee
4105325367 David Schriver Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Notre Dame of Maryland University (University) under programs for the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and the Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. MARYLAND UNIVERSITY OF INTEGRATIVE HEALTH On February 5, 2024, the University entered into an asset purchase agreement with Maryland University of Integrative Health, Inc. (MUIH), a Maryland non-profit corporation, to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of MUIH that constitute the business of MUIH as an educational institution. The accompanying Schedule includes the federal grant activity of MUIH under programs for the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025.
Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
The University previously administered the Federal Perkins Loan Program (“Perkins”), which has been discontinued at the federal level and is no longer authorized to issue new loans. At June 30, 2025, the balance of loans outstanding under the Federal Perkins Loan Program was $6,000, which was subsequently repurchased by the University as part of the liquidation of the program. During the year ended June 30, 2025, there were no disbursements of new loans. As of June 30, 2025, the University had collected $5,254 on one Perkins loan which had not yet been remitted to the U.S. Department of Education (“Department”). In July 2022, the University notified the Department of its intent to voluntarily withdraw participation in the Federal Perkins Loan Program by liquidating its loan portfolio and revolving fund. Liquidation of the program involved announcing its intent to liquidate, borrower notification, and the assignment or purchase of loans. In September 2025, the University remitted the federal share owed to the Department, representing the outstanding principal and interest of the one loan outstanding and the current cash on hand. Based on the federal share percentage of 68.05% of total net capital contributions, the University remitted $7,658 to the Department as part of the final distribution of the Perkins revolving fund. Following the purchase of the final loan and remittance of the federal share of cash collected, the University completed the liquidation of its Federal Perkins Loan portfolio. As a result of the liquidation process, 577 loans in the amount of $1,210,759 were assigned and officially accepted by the Department. As of this report date, the University has completed Steps 1-5 of the liquidation procedures for the purpose of liquidating its Federal Perkins Loan Program. As a result, the University has now retired, purchased, or assigned all outstanding Perkins loans to the U.S. Department of Education, completed its National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) reporting requirements, and returned the Federal Capital Contribution to the Department. Accordingly, no Perkins Loan balances remain outstanding as of the date of issuance of these financial statements.
Federal loans issued to students of the University by the Department of Education during the year ended June 30, 2025 are shown on the Schedule. The University is responsible only for the performance of certain administrative duties with respect to the Direct Loans, and accordingly, these loans are not included in the University’s financial statements, and it is not practicable to determine the balance of loans outstanding to students and former students of the University under these programs. Federally guaranteed loans distributed to students of the University through the Federal Direct Student Loans Program during the year ended June 30, 2025 are summarized as follows:
The University did not elect to use the de minimis cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Compliance Area Special Tests and Provisions – Direct Loan Requirements Criteria or Requirement Pursuant to 34 CFR § 685.304(a) and the Federal Student Aid Handbook, Volume 8 (Direct Loans), Chapter 2, a borrower receiving a Direct Subsidized or Direct Unsubsidized Loan must complete entrance counseling prior to the first disbursement of the loan unless the borrower has previously completed entrance counseling for a prior loan period at the University. Condition Found, Including Perspective During our testing of 40 Direct Loan recipients, we noted that for one student selected for testing, the University did not maintain documentation evidencing that entrance counseling was completed prior to the first Direct Loan disbursement. No evidence of completion was observed within the student information system or the student's electronic file prior to the disbursement date. Possible Asserted Cause and Effect Based on discussions with management, the University makes entrance counseling available to students through the U.S. Department of Education's online platform; however, procedures were not in place to verify and document completion prior to the first disbursement of Direct Loan funds. As a result, Direct Loan funds were disbursed without documented evidence that the borrower satisfied entrance counseling requirements as required by federal regulations. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Validity Our sample of 40 students was selected using a nonstatistical sampling method. Therefore, results of our testing cannot be projected to the entire population. Identification of Whether the Audit Finding is a Repeat of a Finding in the Immediate Prior Audit Finding 2025-001 is not a repeat of a finding from the immediate prior audit. Recommendation We recommend the University implement procedures to verify and document completion of entrance counseling prior to the first Direct Loan disbursement. Controls should ensure that documentation of completion is retained in the student file or that system controls prevent disbursement until entrance counseling requirements are satisfied.
Compliance Area Special Tests and Provisions – Title IV Credit Balance Refunds Criteria or Requirement Pursuant to 34 CFR § 668.164(h), a school must pay a Title IV credit balance directly to the student (or parent borrower, as applicable) as soon as possible, but no later than 14 calendar days after the credit balance occurs. A Title IV credit balance occurs when Title IV funds are credited to a student's account and exceed allowable institutional charges. Condition Found, Including Perspective During testing of 40 students receiving Title IV funds, we noted that for three students, Title IV funds were credited to the student accounts in the University's student billing system, resulting in a Title IV credit balance. Refunds were issued more than 14 calendar days after the credit balance was created. One of the three refunds tested was issued 54 days after the credit balance occurred. The remaining two refunds were also issued beyond the required 14-day timeframe. Possible Asserted Cause and Effect Based on discussions with management, the University calculated the 14-day period based on subsequent changes to loan amounts in COD and/or drawdown timing rather than from the date the Title IV credit balance was created on the student account ledger. As a result, refunds were not issued within the timeframe required by federal regulations. Failure to timely disburse Title IV credit balances may result in noncompliance with federal student financial assistance regulations and may impact students' timely access to funds. Questioned Costs None. Refunds were ultimately issued to students; however, they were not issued within the required 14- day timeframe. Statistical Validity Our sample of 40 students was selected using a nonstatistical sampling method. Therefore, results of our testing cannot be projected to the entire population. Identification of Whether the Audit Finding is a Repeat of a Finding in the Immediate Prior Audit Finding 2025-002 is not a repeat of a finding from the immediate prior audit. Recommendation We recommend that the University revise its procedures to ensure that the 14-day requirement for Title IV credit balance refunds is calculated from the date the credit balance is created on the student account ledger. Management should implement monitoring controls to track credit balances and ensure timely refunds in accordance with federal regulations.
Compliance Area Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Special Tests and Provisions – Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4) Criteria or Requirement In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22, institutions must accurately determine the percentage of the payment period completed using the correct payment period start and end dates to calculate earned and unearned Title IV assistance. If a student withdraws before completing 60% of the payment period, the institution must determine the amount of unearned Title IV funds and return those funds within 45 days of the date of determination. Condition Found, Including Perspective During testing of 10 students who withdrew during the year ended June 30, 2025, we recalculated the Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4) determinations. Differences were identified in three of the 10 selections tested. In two of the three instances, the institution used an incorrect Spring 2025 term end date in the Colleague system when calculating the percentage of the payment period completed. As a result, the students were calculated at or above the 60% completion threshold and determined to have earned 100% of their Title IV assistance, when recalculation using the official academic calendar dates indicated that a return of funds was required. One additional instance resulted in a de minimis difference. Possible Asserted Cause and Effect The term end date configured in the Colleague system did not align with the institution's official academic calendar, and procedures were not in place to verify that system-configured term dates agreed to the approved academic calendar prior to performing R2T4 calculations. As a result, R2T4 determinations were not calculated using the correct payment period dates, which resulted in failure to identify and return unearned Title IV funds in certain instances. If the issue is systemic, additional students who withdrew during the Spring 2025 term may have been similarly affected. Questioned Costs Questioned costs related to the two affected students totaled approximately $5,800, representing Title IV funds that should have been returned based on recalculation using the official term dates. Final questioned costs may change pending management's review of the full withdrawal population for the Spring 2025 term. Statistical Validity A nonstatistical sampling approach was used. Therefore, results cannot be projected to the population; however, the error rate identified indicates the potential for similar noncompliance within the population of students who withdrew during the Spring 2025 term. Identification of Whether the Audit Finding is a Repeat of a Finding in the Immediate Prior Audit Finding 2025-003 is not a repeat of a finding from the immediate prior audit. Recommendation We recommend the University reconcile system-configured term dates within Colleague to the officially approved academic calendar for all academic periods used for Title IV calculations. In addition, the University should perform a comprehensive review of students who withdrew during the Spring 2025 term to determine whether additional R2T4 recalculations and returns are required. Procedures should be implemented to periodically verify that system term dates align with official academic records prior to performing R2T4 calculations.