Audit 393814

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$12.73M
Findings
1
Programs
12
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-24

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1182406 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
K9YXV4BK2BB8 Jana Williams Auditee
4065901044 Melissa Soldano Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

This Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of the Authority and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Uniform Guidance Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements.
This Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards does not include the amount of cost sharing funds provided by or through the Authority as required under the terms of certain grants or programs. The Authority provided cost sharing under the following programs: Small Business Development Center in the amount of $199,358 and APEX Accelerators Program in the amount of $71,598.
The Authority made one loan on business projects during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 with EDA COVID RLF funds. The following is a summary of figures used in the SEFA calculation for the year ended June 30, 2025.
The Authority has the ability to make loans and grants to third parties pursuant to a Brownfield Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). There were no loan advances during the year and no subgrants awarded.
The Authority has the ability to make loans and grants to third parties pursuant to a Brownfield Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). There were no loan advances during the year and no subgrants awarded.
The Authority made no new loans on business projects during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 with County CDBG funds. The following is a summary of loan activity for the year ended June 30, 2025:
The Authority made no new loans on business projects during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 with IRP funds. The following is a summary of loan activity for the year ended June 30, 2025:
The Authority made one loan on business projects during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 with MPILP funds. The following is a summary of loan activity for the year ended June 30, 2025:
The Authority made one loan on business projects during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 with MPILP funds. The following is a summary of loan activity for the year ended June 30, 2025:
The Authority made no loans on business projects during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 with City RLF COVID Relief funds. The following is a summary of loan activity for the year ended June 30, 2025:
The Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Reporting ALN 66.818: Brownfields Assessment Grant Criteria: The grant award requires the following reports for the Brownfields Assessment Grant: Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) done at least annually, and quarterly progress reports. Condition: For the Brownfields Assessment Grant, the Authority provided the quarterly reports for testing. We tested two of the four quarterly reports and found that not all the amounts reported agreed with the accounting records, and there was no indication of a review of the reports prior to submission. Context: The quarterly reports were submitted, and not all amounts reported agreed to the accounting records for both the Brownfields Assessment Grant reports tested. Effect: Original information submitted included inaccurate data. The reports should be reviewed to ensure accurate information is reported, and documentation of the review should be retained. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The reasons for the differences in the reported amounts and the accounting records is a result of using the proposal amounts in the reports and not final amounts. These reports were corrected and resubmitted in September 2025 and going forward will undergo review prior to submission. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority retain evidence of review for all submitted reports and confirm amounts reported are supported by the accounting records. Great Falls Development Authority Response: Rapid growth, many new staff members, and increased complexity of our organization proved that some of our procedural systems were no longer adequate to ensure compliance. We relied too much on single team members being solely responsible for reporting on some grants or contracts and needed to put in place a new management structure, better onboarding processes, more intensive staff training, and new compliance procedures. We have put in place three measures to ensure that all reports are submitted as required and every report is accurate. First, each grant or contract now has at least three staff team members responsible for report submittal and filing, the grant or contract manager, the direct supervisor, and our CFO. Second, all documents concerning each grant or contract are stored electronically on our server and on our Sharepoint. Third, we have put in place a more robust management structure to handle our rapid growth, creating an Executive Vice President position, an Executive Assistant position, and an Accounting Assistant position to properly manage the increased management, accounting and administrative workload. The new compliance assurance steps include: 1. All required reports, internal and external, require a coversheet that documents the review process. The coversheet contains the due date, program/grant/contract number, specific report, period of report, if the report is internal or external, and the staff lead. 2. Program Managers, Supervisors, and our Chief Financial Officer have been trained on how to verify the correct financial statements for the reporting of their specific program/grant/contract. This is a reconciliation between the program manager’s financial records and GFDA’s QuickBooks report, produced by our Chief Financial Officer. 3. When a report is completed the program manager signs that they have verified and approve the report, the direct supervisor also reviews and signs in approval, and the Chief Financial Officer reviews and signs in approval. 4. When the program manager submits the report to the reporting body, they copy their director supervisor, and both sign the document verifying the report was submitted. These Report Review and Approval sheets are then kept with the program/grant/contract financial documentation records thus retaining evidence of review for all submitted reports and confirming amounts reported are supported by the accounting records.