Audit 391841

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$2.80M
Findings
9
Programs
1
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2026-03-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1179426 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179427 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179428 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179429 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179430 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179431 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179432 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179433 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1179434 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
G477JEH7ZTC2 Kyle Christiansen Auditee
2184442438 Mary Reedy Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The Authority has elected not to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Passenger facility charges revenue consists of passenger facility fees and investment earnings on the restricted cash related to passenger facility charges. Expenditures represent airport construction related costs incurred by the Authority.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: AIP 45, AIP 46, AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 44, AIP 52, AIP 50, AIP 42, AIP 49, 2024 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Transportation Pass-Through Numbers: AIP 45, AIP 46, AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 44, AIP 52, AIP 50, AIP 42, AIP 49 Award Period: Year-Ended December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Standard internal control procedures suggest that reports should have a timely review documented by someone other than the preparer. Condition: During testing of controls over reporting, it was noted the Authority did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure that the FAA 5100-27 and FAA 5100-26 reports are reviewed for accuracy. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During testing of controls over reporting, it was noted that there were no reviews over the FAA 5100-27 and FAA 5100-26 reports. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: Errors made in the reports may not be discovered. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority have a secondary person reviewing these reports before they are submitted to the federal agency. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.