Audit 391184

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$4.81M
Findings
0
Programs
9
Organization: Project Harmony, Inc. (VT)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
19.450 ECA INDIVIDUAL GRANTS $681,793 Yes 0
19.441 ECA – AMERICAN SPACES $407,778 Yes 0
19.703 CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS $68,356 Yes 0
98.001 USAID FOREIGN ASSISTANCE FOR PROGRAMS OVERSEAS $65,747 Yes 0
19.704 COUNTER NARCOTICS $58,706 Yes 0
19.900 AEECA/ESF PD PROGRAMS $48,371 Yes 0
19.040 PUBLIC DIPLOMACY PROGRAMS $36,349 Yes 0
19.421 ACADEMIC EXCHANGE PROGRAMS - ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROGRAMS $31,364 Yes 0
19.415 PROFESSIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGE PROGRAMS - CITIZEN EXCHANGES $13,136 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
N52LVDVMRPW5 Meg Harris Auditee
8024964545 Walt Derengowski Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the Federal award activity of the Organization under programs of the Federal Government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) . The Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization; accordingly, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Organization has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.