Audit 389905

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$45.17M
Findings
2
Programs
6
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-02

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1175936 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E
1175937 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.881 MOVING TO WORK DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM $33.25M Yes 1
14.879 MAINSTREAM VOUCHERS $1.72M Yes 0
14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS $828,918 Yes 0
14.870 RESIDENT OPPORTUNITY AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES - SERVICE COORDINATORS $215,749 Yes 0
14.238 SHELTER PLUS CARE $212,785 Yes 0
14.267 CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM $80,095 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LJFJXL5TKP23 Sean Cooper Auditee
8592815031 Dale R. Rector Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Authority.
The Authority provided no federal awards to subrecipients during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025.
The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing Authority received no federal awards of non-monetary assistance that are required to be disclosed for the year ended June 30, 2025. The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing Authority had no loans, loan guarantees, or federally restricted endowment funds required to be disclosed for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing Authority maintains the following limits of insurance as of June 30, 2025: Property $ 100,000,000 Liability $ 2,000,000 Commercial Auto $ 2,000,000 Worker Compensation Statutory Directors of Officers Liability $ 2,000,000 Public Employee Dishonesty $ 500,000 Settled claims have not exceeded the above commercial insurance coverage limits over the past three years.

Finding Details

Finding 2025-001 – Moving To Work Demonstration Tenant Files – Eligibility – Internal Control over Tenant Files – Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Moving To Work Demonstration - subsidy ALN #14.881 Condition & Cause: Our review of one hundred seventy-one (171) Moving To Work tenant files found that twenty-three (23) files were noncompliant, representing 13.5% of our sample. Some files had multiple compliance issues. Specifically, we identified: • Eight (8) files with miscalculations of annual income • Two (2) files missing proper verification of income or deductions • Eleven (11) files missing the EIV report. • Four (4) files missing support for a unit inspection. • Three (3) files for which the annual reexamination was completed late. Using extrapolation, we concluded that the potential misstatement of subsidy from income miscalculations is $35,824, which is immaterial to the financial statements. The majority of the noncompliance occurred within the Low-Rent and Business Activities programs. Contributing factors included high staff turnover and inadequate oversight during the year. As a corrective measure, the Agency established new positions within the department during the fiscal year—including a director and an inspector—to strengthen oversight and improve compliance. Criteria: Compliance requirements are outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations, the Housing Authority’s Admissions and Continued Occupancy Policy (ACOP), Administrative Plan, Moving To Work (MTW) Plan, and specific HUD guidelines for documenting and maintaining Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher tenant files. Effect: Failure to accurately calculate tenant income, obtain required verification, and conduct timely reexaminations may result in improper subsidy determinations, noncompliance with HUD regulations, and potential financial exposure. Additionally, missing EIV reports and inspection documentation reduce the Agency’s ability to ensure program integrity and housing quality standards. Ongoing noncompliance may also draw scrutiny from regulatory bodies. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency enhance its internal controls over tenant files by strengthening standardized quality control procedures and support for supervisory oversight. Additionally, staff should receive regular training on HUD compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: $35,824 Repeat Finding: Yes Was sampling statistically valid? Yes Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendations.