Audit 389422

Finding No. 2025-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Deficiencies Repeat Finding: No ALN and Program: 84.002 – Adult Education State Grant Program Award Amount: $1,384,339 Award Number: 09-401-146-125 Award Year: 7/1/2024-6/30/2025 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 specifies requirements for monitoring subaward agreements. Section (b) of the guidance lists required elements to be included in subaward agreements, including subrecipient identifying information, information about the original federal award dates and amounts, contact information, and compliance requirements of the award. Section (c) specifies that grantees evaluate each subrecipient's fraud risk and risk of noncompliance with the subaward. Section (e) requires grantees to assess risk and monitor the activities of a subrecipient as necessary to ensure the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward. MATC's system of control is required to be designed and implemented in order to ensure compliance of subawards with the applicable compliance requirements. Condition/Context: In testing compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.332, we noted that MATC's internal controls over subrecipient monitoring requirements were not effectively operating during the year ended June 30, 2025. MATC's subaward agreement with Literacy Services of Wisconsin did not contain all the required information included in Section (b). In particular, the agreement was missing the subrecipient's Unique Entity Identification Number (UEI), the Federal and / or State Award Identification Number (FAIN), Federal and / or State Award Date, and the indirect cost rate for the Federal and / or State Award. Additionally, MATC was not able to produce evidence of the required risk assessment process, and resulting monitoring activities deemed necessary to ensure the subgrantee's compliance with Federal Requirements. MATC's review and approval process for this subaward did not prevent, detect, or identify the missing contract information or the lack of documented risk assessments. Monitoring activities were performed; however, without the documented risk assessment, it is unclear whether the activities were sufficient. Cause: MATC has made subawards under the AEFL program for many years, and the same subaward document has been used without amendment. While the agreement was subjected to the required review and approval process internally, the review did not identify the updated requirements for elements of the agreements. Additionally, MATC has historically performed site monitoring and review of financial reports for all of its sub-awardees; however, in 2025 the individual responsible for performing this process retired and a replacement was not found for several months, resulting in a vacancy in the position and lack of available staffing to complete the monitoring documentation and process. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The subaward agreement is not in compliance with Federal sub-award requirements, and an appropriate risk assessment was not documented, which could result in incorrect reporting of the award by the sub-grantee, or potential non-compliance of the sub-awardee. Recommendation: We recommend MATC evaluate its award approval process and implement clear and robust procedures designed to ensure agreements are compared to the most current set of requirements for compliance.