Audit 388144

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$5.23M
Findings
7
Programs
13
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-02-19

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1174635 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABCJMN
1174636 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABCJMN
1174637 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABCJMN
1174638 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABCJMN
1174639 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1174640 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1174641 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN

Contacts

Name Title Type
TFHHX6Y1K9N4 Gary Ceccarelli Auditee
7248437470 Gary Ceccarelli Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Big Beaver Falls Area School District and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.
The District passed and had approved by the appropriate agency budgets for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 for all federal programs.
Big Beaver Falls Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
The District issued a revised data collection form that replaced the initial data collection form. There were two reasons for the revised report: 1. Information relating to finding 2025-2 in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs was incomplete in the data collection form. 2. The audit report did not disclose information relating to finding 2024-2 in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Both errors were corrected and a new data collection form was filed.

Finding Details

2025-2 Limited Staff Condition: The District has a limited staff responsible for or access to: a. posting to the general ledger b. check writing c. payroll processing Criteria: The small size of the District’s office staff limits the extent of separation of duties. The basic premise in an ideal accounting office is that no one employee should have access to both physical assets and the related accounting records or to all phases of a transaction. Some examples of lack of segregation of duties at the District are as follows: An individual can process invoices, override purchase order amounts, prepare checks, mail checks, edit the vendor master file, as well as open the mail for checks received. An individual initiates payroll checks as well as prepares payroll checks, has printer sign payroll checks (electronic signature), reviews and authorizes electronic payroll disbursements, prepares distributions of payroll checks (rubber bands by building and mail man disburses) throughout the buildings (all sealed by machine), controls unclaimed paychecks, resolves employee payroll inquiries, and edits the payroll master file. Cause: The District does not have the number of employees necessary in the business office to properly segregate all duties. Recommendation: Ideally, the District would hire the number of staff necessary to segregate all duties. However, we realize segregation of duties is not practical, if not impossible. Because of this internal control situation, the responsibility of the Business Manager is greatly increased because the Board must rely on his knowledge of the everyday operation to discover any material changes in the District’s financial position. Effect: A lack of separation of duties makes the School District more susceptible to a misappropriation of District assets. Questioned Costs: None identified. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.