Audit 38754

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$40.16M
Findings
2
Programs
15
Organization: United Planning Organization (DC)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-07-02
Auditor: Sb & Company LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
43445 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
619887 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
PDL7UK56DB71 Andrew Harris Auditee
2022384648 Stephen MacKall Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: All Federal grant operations of United Planning Organization (UPO) are included in the scopeof Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Single Audit)for the year ended September 30, 2022. The Single Audit was performed in accordance withthe provisions of the OMB Compliance Supplement (the Compliance Supplement).Compliance testing of all requirements, as described in the Compliance Supplement, wasperformed for the major grant programs noted below. The programs on the schedule ofexpenditures of Federal awards represent all Federal award programs for fiscal year 2022 cashor non-cash expenditure activities. For our single audit testing, we tested Federal awardprograms to ensure coverage of at least 40% of Federally granted funds. Our actual coveragewas 68%. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Condition: For 5 out of 11 selections, no support was provided by management to document independent review and verification of income amounts reported by the selected participants. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. As defined in CSBG Act, at 42 USC 9902(2), Eligible Entities/Other Subrecipients: The official poverty guidelines as revised annually by HHS shall be used to determine eligibility. The poverty guidelines are issued each year in the Federal Register and on the HHS website (http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/). The CSBG Act, at 42 USC 9902(2), grants the state the authority to adopt a revised poverty threshold but it may not exceed 125 percent of the HHS-determined poverty guidelines. Audit procedures should be designed to test whether recipients of CSBG services meet the federal poverty guidelines. Cause: UPO did not have proper controls in place to ensure the eligibility requirements of the grant were met. Effect: UPO may not be in compliance with the eligibility requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that UPO: (1)implement procedures and documents needed for documentation and retention of the review and approval of eligibility criteria; and (2) provide training about procedures related to the documentation of eligibility evaluations. Management?s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See schedule of corrective action plan.
Condition: For 5 out of 11 selections, no support was provided by management to document independent review and verification of income amounts reported by the selected participants. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. As defined in CSBG Act, at 42 USC 9902(2), Eligible Entities/Other Subrecipients: The official poverty guidelines as revised annually by HHS shall be used to determine eligibility. The poverty guidelines are issued each year in the Federal Register and on the HHS website (http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/). The CSBG Act, at 42 USC 9902(2), grants the state the authority to adopt a revised poverty threshold but it may not exceed 125 percent of the HHS-determined poverty guidelines. Audit procedures should be designed to test whether recipients of CSBG services meet the federal poverty guidelines. Cause: UPO did not have proper controls in place to ensure the eligibility requirements of the grant were met. Effect: UPO may not be in compliance with the eligibility requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that UPO: (1)implement procedures and documents needed for documentation and retention of the review and approval of eligibility criteria; and (2) provide training about procedures related to the documentation of eligibility evaluations. Management?s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See schedule of corrective action plan.