Audit 386837

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$37.50M
Findings
3
Programs
14
Organization: City of Lawton (OK)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-02-11

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1173294 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes I
1173295 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes I
1173296 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
UJ7VNNPEKLJ6 Kristin Huntley Auditee
5805813328 Cynthia Burns Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the City of Lawton, Oklahoma (City) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position/fund balance, or cash flows of the City. The Schedule does not include the Fires Innovation Science and Technology Accelerator (FISTA) Development Trust Authority federal awards programs.

Finding Details

Federal Transit Cluster Assistance Listing No. 20.507 US Department of Transportation Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.318–200.326) requires non‑Federal entities to maintain documentation sufficient to detail the history of each procurement, including but not limited to: • Rationale for the procurement method • Contractor selection or rejection • Basis for contract price • Evidence of competition or sole‑source justification when applicable These requirements ensure transparency, competitiveness, and proper stewardship of Federal funds. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we noted that the City did not retain adequate documentation to support procurement actions. Missing documentation included bid/quote evaluations, price analyses, and evidence of compliance with competitive procurement requirements. As a result, we could not determine whether procurement requirements were properly followed. Cause: Proper accounting policies and procedures were not in place related to review of documentation related to procurement of vendors. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate documentation, the government cannot demonstrate compliance with procurement standards. This increases the risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance and inefficient or noncompetitive purchasing practice. Questioned Costs: None Context: Of the four procurements tested, three lacked one or more required elements of procurement documentation. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This finding was not reported in the prior year. Recommendation: Policies and procedures over procurement should be modified to ensure that adequate documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation. Management will work to ensure proper policies and procedures are established and followed.