Audit 386511

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$2.64M
Findings
1
Programs
5
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-02-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
U49EMXEVWPB5 Sheila Norris Auditee
3162932659 Laura Lehmer Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development No. 14.241 – Housing Opportunities for Person with AIDS Grant Period Year Ended June 30, 2025 Criteria: While the housing opportunity program implemented further segregation of duties over the program participants' eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculation and program reporting during the year, the internal controls were lacking in verifying the participant’s utility assistance calculations. Condition and Context: We noted an incorrect utility assistance calculation, which internal control processes did not identify. Effect: While testing a sample of forty program transactions, one client utility assistance expense was calculated incorrectly. The payment was reviewed and approved which resulted in an overpayment of $340. Cause: The established internal controls failed to detect an incorrect utility payment. Recommendation: Internal control processes should include recalculating the amount being paid for each utility assistance and how many weeks the payment covers. During the year, additional staff were hired to improve controls and mitigate the risk. We noted improvement as the year progressed. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure appropriate internal controls are established and followed, see attached corrective action plan.