Audit 385431

FY End
2024-03-31
Total Expended
$1.08M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2026-02-04
Auditor: HAYNIE & COMPANY

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1172380 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes C
1172381 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes C

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.872 PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND $635,080 Yes 1
14.850 PUBLIC HOUSING OPERATING FUND $318,855 Yes 1
14.195 PROJECT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE (PBRA) $122,366 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HLG5S62ZULM3 Dave Maier Auditee
9703010637 Brent Stratton Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended March 31, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, they are not intended to and do not present the financial position, changes in financial position, or cash flows of the Authority
The significant accounting policies for the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are as follows: Basis of Accounting Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Indirect Cost Rate The Authority has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
The program title and ALN number was obtained from the federal or pass-through grantor or the sam.gov website.

Finding Details

Condition During our audit, we noted that the Authority has not yet implemented formal procedures for monitoring and investing available cash balances. Substantial funds continue to be maintained in non-interestbearing accounts. Total cash and investment balances at year-end amounted to approximately $2,554,904, consisting of $2,434,274 held in bank deposits and $120,330 in investments. Of this total, $361,135 represented restricted cash not available for investment, leaving approximately $2.07 million in unrestricted cash balances held primarily in bank deposits. In addition, the Authority had an operating subsidy receivable of $149,309 at year-end, indicating that a significant portion of available HUD funds had not yet been drawn. The Authority made only two operating-subsidy drawdowns during the year rather than performing monthly draws as required by HUD. Criteria Governmental entities should ensure that available cash balances are prudently invested in accordance with approved policies and applicable regulations to maximize earnings while maintaining safety and liquidity. Operating subsidies should also be drawn down as expenses are incurred to comply with HUD cash-management requirements. Effect Maintaining significant cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts results in lost investment opportunities and reduced interest income. Infrequent drawdowns may also result in inefficient cashflow management and noncompliance with HUD requirements for timely use of program funds. The Authority earned total interest income of approximately $18,472 during the fiscal year, of which $5,982.69 was from investments yielding an average rate of return of about 5.10 percent. To estimate the potential earnings had available funds been properly invested, we assumed that unrestricted cash balances, less $200,000 retained in checking accounts for operating needs ($100,000 for Public Housing and $100,000 for MacLaren), were invested in an account earning a similar 5.10 percent return. Based on this assumption, projected interest income would have been approximately $93,665, an increase of about $75,000 over actual earnings. Even under a conservative 3 percent rate of return, projected interest income would be about $55,000, or nearly $36,000 higher. This analysis demonstrates the continued opportunity cost of maintaining large balances in non-interest-bearing accounts. Cause The Authority did not have effective cash management and investment procedures in place. Recommendation The Authority should establish separate cash management and investment procedures. The Authority should advance funds as they are obligated from HUD, which would generally require operating subsidy being advanced on a monthly basis.