Audit 385339

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.38M
Findings
135
Programs
6
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2026-02-03

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1172164 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172165 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172166 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172167 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172168 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172169 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172170 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172171 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172172 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172173 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172174 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172175 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172176 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172177 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172178 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172179 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172180 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172181 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172182 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172183 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172184 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172185 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172186 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172187 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172188 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172189 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172190 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1172191 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172192 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172193 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172194 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172195 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172196 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172197 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172198 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172199 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172200 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172201 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172202 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172203 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172204 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172205 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172206 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172207 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172208 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172209 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172210 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172211 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172212 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172213 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172214 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172215 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172216 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172217 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes L
1172218 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172219 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172220 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172221 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172222 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172223 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172224 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172225 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172226 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172227 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172228 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172229 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172230 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172231 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172232 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172233 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172234 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172235 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172236 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172237 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172238 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172239 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172240 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172241 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172242 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172243 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172244 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes L
1172245 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172246 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172247 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172248 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172249 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172250 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172251 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172252 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172253 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172254 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172255 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172256 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172257 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172258 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172259 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172260 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172261 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172262 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172263 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172264 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172265 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172266 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172267 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172268 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172269 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172270 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172271 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes L
1172272 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172273 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172274 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172275 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172276 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172277 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172278 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172279 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172280 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172281 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172282 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172283 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172284 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172285 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172286 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172287 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172288 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172289 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172290 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172291 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172292 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172293 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172294 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172295 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172296 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172297 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L
1172298 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.438 PACIFIC COAST SALMON RECOVERY PACIFIC SALMON TREATY PROGRAM $243,309 Yes 5
15.244 AQUATICS RESOURCES MANAGEMENT $74,760 Yes 5
15.234 SECURE RURAL SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITY SELF-DETERMINATION $16,287 Yes 5
66.460 NONPOINT SOURCE IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS $8,905 Yes 5
10.665 SCHOOLS AND ROADS - GRANTS TO STATES $7,132 Yes 5
15.015 GOOD NEIGHBOR AUTHORITY $3,062 Yes 5

Contacts

Name Title Type
NVHAJG8FK8E9 April Thiringer Auditee
5416735756 Marc Rogers Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-003 – Lack of Internal Controls over Expenditure Documentation (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceName of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Title 2 CFR §200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires entities to maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of funds, including supporting documentation for expenditures, and 2 CFR §200.430 requires documentation for compensation for personal services. Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the federal programs, the entity was unable to provide invoice copies or other sufficient supporting documentation for certain expenditures tested. As a result, we could not verify the allowability, accuracy, and proper approval of these costs in accordance with federal requirements. In addition, records were unavailable for Personnel expenditures that were charged to grant awards, and no support or evidence of time per grant was available. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers does not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that invoice documentation and other supporting records are retained, centrally filed, and readily available for audit and monitoring purposes. In addition, management did not perform ongoing monitoring to verify that required documentation was maintained prior to reimbursement or reporting. Effect or Potential Effect: because supporting documentation was not available, expenditures from detail documentation could not be substantiated. This increases the risk that the unallowable, unsupported, or inaccurate costs may be charged to the federal program and reported in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Questioned Cost: Yes, $332,409 related to Personnel costs, equipment and other purchases that were not documented with detailed support. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit.Recommendation: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers should implement policies and procedures requiring invoice copies and supporting documentation to be maintained for all grant expenditures. Management should strengthen record retention practices, provide training to staff on documentation requirements, and implement periodic internal reviews to ensure compliance. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-004 – Insufficient Skills, Knowledge and Training, and Leadership (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land ManagementCriteria: Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the award terms and conditions. This includes ensuring that:  Personnel administering federal awards possess adequate skills, knowledge, and experience.  Management and leadership provide appropriate oversight of federal award activities.  Financial management systems adequately support accurate reporting, documentation, retention, and reconciliation of federal expenditures in accordance with 2 CFR §200.302. Condition: During the audit of federal awards, the entity did not demonstrate sufficient skills, knowledge, or experience of the staff and leadership responsible for administering and overseeing federal programs. Specifically:  Adequate supporting documentation for federal award expenditures was not maintained or provided.  Leadership oversight of federal award compliance activities was limited, and management review of grant activity were not evidenced. These conditions resulted in weaknesses in financial reporting, compliance monitoring, and documentation related to federal awards. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers has not ensured that staffing levels, qualifications, and experience are sufficient to support federal award administration and compliance. In addition, leadership lacks adequate knowledge of federal award requirements to provide effective governance, oversight, and monitoring of compliance activities. Formal training and documented procedures for federal awards management have not been prioritized. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result of these deficiencies:  Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers is at increased risk of non-compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements.  Federal expenditures may be unsupported, inaccurately reported, or unallowable.  Errors or compliance violations may not be detected or corrected in a timely manner.  The entity may be subject to questioned costs, repayment of federal funds, or additional scrutiny from grantor agencies. Questioned Cost: None identified Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers:  Ensure staff responsible for federal awards receive appropriate training on Uniform Guidance requirements, grant financial management, documentation, and compliance monitoring. Assign federal award oversight to personnel with sufficient experience and qualification or obtain external grant management and accounting support as needed.  Establish written policies and procedures for federal award administration, including expenditure documentation, reconciliation, compliance review, and management approvals.  Require leadership to perform and document periodic oversight and monitoring of federal awards, including review of reconciliations reimbursement requests, and compliance metrics.  Implement ongoing monitoring and internal control assessments to ensure compliance with federal award requirements. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-005 – Inadequate Procurement Documentation (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the InteriorFederal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Federal procurement standards require non-Federal entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for the contract price. Competitive procurement must follow the entity’s written procedures consistent with 2 CFR §§200.317-200.327, including:  Written procedures for procurement (§200.318(a)).  Full and open competition requirements (§200.319).  Methods of procurement (sealed bids, proposal requirements, and required documentation (§200.320).  Contract cost and price justification, (§200.324).  Suspension/debarment verification for covered transactions (§200.214; §200.213). Condition: During the audit period, the Entity did not retain sufficient procurement documentation for several contracts funded under the above Assistance Listings. Specifically, files lacked one or more of the following:  Evidence of the procurement method used.  Price or cost analysis.  Suspension/debarment checks for vendors where required.  Documentation of competition.  Conflict-of-interest attestations. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers procurement procedures were not sufficiently detailed or consistently applied to federal purchases. No evidence of procedures or review for procurement or suspension / debarment was provided to auditors. Turnover and limited training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards contributed to the inconsistent file completeness. Effect or Potential Effect: Without complete procurement documentation, the Entity cannot demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements, increasing the risk of:  Noncompetitive awards or unreasonable prices.  Unallowable costs for the award requirements.  Potential disallowance or repayment of federal funds.  Findings in federal or pass-through monitoring and future audits. Questioned Cost: Yes, $902,496 related to expenditures that had no procurement support or detail. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to procurement, suspension or debarment procedures or processes. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Update Written Procurement Procedures o Incorporate Uniform Guidance thresholds and methods (§200.320), competition requirements (§200.319), and documentation expectations (history of procurement). o Embed steps for suspension / debarment checks and Appendix II Contract clauses.  Standardized Procurement Checklist o Pre-award checklist that verifies: method, competition evidence, cost/price analysis, conflict of interest attestations, SAM exclusion check, and required federal clauses. o Post -award checklist ensuring complete contract file (award memo, bid tab / evaluation, signed agreement, clause verification).  Cost/Price Analysis Guidance o Require documented price reasonableness for small purchases, formal cost or price analysis for larger or sole-source awards, per (§200.324).  Training & Accountability o Provide targeted training to procurement and program staff on 2 CFR §§200.317- 20.327 and Assistance Listing award conditions. o Implement supervisory pre-award review and periodic file audits. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-006 – Compliance; Internal Control over Compliance, Reporting (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of AgricultureFederal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200, recipients must submit performance and financial reports as required by the terms and conditions of the award and must retain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance (see (§200.301Monitoring and reporting program performance, and §200.328 Financial reporting, §200.329 Monitoring and reporting program performance, and §200.334 Retention requirements for records). The grant agreements for awards above require timely submission of performance / progress reports by specified due dates, with documentation maintained to support the submitted information. Condition: For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the auditee could not provide sufficient evidence that required reports for the programs listed were prepared, reviewed, and submitted in accordance with grant terms. Specifically:  No provided required financial reports, and Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers lacked copies or evidence of submission, and support for reported amounts requested.  Auditors were not provided with performance/progress reports and were instructed that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had no retained copies, review sign-offs, or submission confirmation.  Where payments were received, support for the required reports or metrics were not retained and could not be supplied to auditors for reconciling to underlying records. Cause: Management has not implemented formal reporting controls, including:  A documented reporting calendar with due dates and responsible staff,  Reconciliation of report amounts to the accounting records,  Retention procedures for report copies, underlying support, and submission confirmations, and  Supervisory review evidenced by signatures or workflow approvals. Effect or Potential Effect: Absent evidence of timely, accurate reporting and adequate record retention:  The organization is at risk of noncompliance with federal award conditions,  Inaccurate financial or performance information may be reported to the funding agency, and  The entity may be subject to remedial actions, including heightened monitoring, repayment of questioned amounts, or potential suspension of funding. Questioned Cost: None directly noted, but potential risk if reports were incomplete or inaccurate.Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to reporting of activity, expenditures, or progress of the awards. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers:  Establish a formal reporting and retention policy aligned with 2 CFR 200 and grant terms.  Implement a centralized reporting calendar that tracks due dates, preparers, reviewers, and submission methods.  Require reconciliations of financial reports to the general ledger and supporting schedules, retain the reconciliation with the reporting package.  Create standard workpapers for performance metrics for each award.  Configure the grant portal or document management system to retain submission confirmations, reports, receipts, and version -controlled copies of all reports for awards.  Document supervisory review through sign-offs prior to submission and with evidence retained.  Provide training to staff on Uniform Guidance requirements and record retention (§200.334). District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-007 – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) – Incorrect CFDA / Assistance Listing Numbers Reporting; Internal Control over Compliance (Significant Deficiency) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife FoundationAssistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510(b), auditees must prepare a complete and accurate SEFA including correct Assistance Listing (formerly CFDA) numbers, program names, and amounts. This is essential for proper identification of federal programs and determination of major programs. Condition: The SEFA for fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 was provided after asking for the SEFA repeatedly. When finally received, the SEFA contained incorrect Assistance Listing numbers for multiple programs/awards, which could lead to misclassification of federal awards. Context: The SEFA reported $1,381,646 in federal expenditures across 27 programs/grant agreements. Testing revealed that 23 of the 27 grant awards had incorrect Assistance Listing numbers on the SEFA and were not aligned with agreements or program information. The SEFA was finalized, only after significant auditor follow-up. Cause: Management did not have adequate procedures for compiling and reviewing SEFA information, including verification of Assistance Listing numbers against official sources and award documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Incorrect CFDA / Assistance Listing numbers may:  Impair auditor’s ability to properly identify major programs,  Result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance reporting requirements,  Increase risk of audit findings and questioned costs in future periods. Questioned Cost: None identified Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers:  Establish a formal SEFA preparation process, including a checklist for verifying Assistance Listing numbers against award documents and official listings, Assign responsibility for timely SEFA submission, and require supervisory review before providing to auditors.  Maintain documentation supporting CFDA/ Assistance Listing numbers and program details in a centralized grant file. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager