Audit 384579

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$25.01M
Findings
5
Programs
14
Organization: City of Asheville (NC)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-01-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1171304 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes M
1171305 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes M
1171306 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1171307 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1171308 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
WTHRNPCARBL9 Tony McDowell Auditee
8282595635 Daniel Gougherty Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (SEFSA) includes the federal and State grant activity of the City of Asheville, North Carolina (the City) under the programs of the federal government and the State of North Carolina for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this SEFSA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and the State Single Audit Implementation Act. Because the SEFSA presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City.
The U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) annually awards "Airport Improvement Grant(s)" to the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority (the "Authority"). The City of Asheville is the official sponsor of the Authority, recognized by the FAA to accept the grant. The Authority receives funding directly from the granting agency and assumes all compliance obligations.
The North Carolina Department of Justice does not consider Opioid Settlement Funds either federal or state financial assistance since they are from a settlement with major drug companies. Since these funds are subject to the State Single Audit Implementation Act, they are reported as Other Financial Assistance on the SEFSA and considered state awards for state single audit requirements.
During the fiscal year, the City received a State Cash Flow Loan from the state of North Carolina through the North Carolina Department of State Treasurer in the amount of $2,791,793. The loan was provided to assist the City with temporary cash flow needs and is not considered a grant or aid program. Loan proceeds received should be reported on the SEFSA as the current year expenditures. The loan is expected to be repaid in full by the repayment date of June 30, 2030. As of June 30, 2025, the outstanding balance of the loan was $2,791,793.

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Home Investment Partnership Program Assistance Listing Number 14.239 Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Finding 2025-002 Criteria: Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance states that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, according to section 200.332 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Non-federal entities must also verify that a subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Grant Guidance. Condition: The City did not perform monitoring for subrecipient eligibility determinations and did not verify subrecipients were audited as required by the Uniform Grant Guidance. Effect: The City could be reimbursing subrecipients for unallowable costs. Cause: The City did not have an adequate process in place to ensure reviews of subrecipient activities were being completed and required audits were being completed. Questioned Costs: $262,000 Recommendation: We recommend the City ensure its subrecipient monitoring policies are followed and include procedures to review audit reports of subrecipients and review of subrecipient monitoring eligibility determinations. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this, which is further discussed in the corrective action plan.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number 14.218 Reporting Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance Finding 2025-003 Criteria: Section 170 Appendix A of the Uniform Guidance states that unless the direct recipient is exempt, the direct recipient must report each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 in Federal funds for a subaward to an entity or Federal agency. The recipient must also report a subaward if a modification increases the Federal funding to an amount that equals or exceeds $30,000. All reported subawards should reflect the total amount of the subaward. According to section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not report subrecipient awards as required per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) and the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Effect: The City is not in compliance with reporting requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Cause: The City did not have an adequate process in place to ensure subrecipient awards were timely reported to the Federal agency. Recommendation: We recommend the City ensure their subrecipient monitoring policies are followed and include procedures to ensure awards are reported timely to the respective Federal agency. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this, which is further discussed in the corrective action plan.