Audit 382466

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$31.87M
Findings
3
Programs
16
Organization: Claremont Graduate University (CA)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-01-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1169508 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1169509 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1169510 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
N34CXJCDNDU1 Karen Sisson Auditee
9096079060 Melissa Harman Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Claremont Graduate University (the University) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ('Uniform Guidance'). Because it presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University.
The federal student loan program listed subsequently is administered directly by the University and balances and transactions relating to this program are included in the University's financial statements. "&"The outstanding balance at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. "&"The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2025 consists of: (See Notes to SEFA - Note 3 for take included)

Finding Details

FINDING 2025-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (SEE FINDING 2025-001 FOR INCLUDED TABLE) Criteria – 34 CFR section 685.309(b)(2): Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that: (i) a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition/context – A sample of 20 federal aid recipient students were selected from system generated reports of students who graduated, reported a physical address change, withdrew, or dropped during the 2024-2025 academic year. The enrollment information and withdrawal, address change, or graduation date per the University’s records was compared to the information reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in order to determine if status changes were reported within the required timeframes. Of the 20 students who had a change in address, graduated, or withdrew, there were four student files with errors. There was one student file that had incorrect enrollment status reported and not reported within the required timeframe. A second student file was reported under the incorrect enrollment status but within the appropriate time requirement. Lastly, two additional student files were not reported within the required timeframe. Cause – The review procedures in place do not sufficiently address situations involving the Degree Verify transmission failures. Effect – The NSLDS database did not include accurate information until the point at which it was corrected. This information is utilized by ED, the Direct Loan program, lenders, and other institutions to determine in-school status, deferment, and grace periods of student loans. Incorrect information could result in incorrect deferment, grace periods, billing, and repayment of student loans. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend the University establish a formal policy requiring a review of student status information submitted to the NSLDS, by a third-party intermediary on the University’s behalf, for completeness and accuracy. We also recommend the University establish a cadence of monitoring reporting deadlines, particularly those around classes of graduating students. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management agrees and has created a corrective action plan.