Audit 38189

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.00M
Findings
6
Programs
6
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-07
Auditor: Sb & Company LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
42552 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
42553 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
42554 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
618994 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
618995 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
618996 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.370 Soar- Formula Combined $376,439 Yes 1
84.370 Soar-Cares Combined (esser Iii) $201,588 Yes 1
21.027 Coronavirus Stated and Local Fiscal Recovery- Pcs Reopening Facilities $181,818 - 0
84.002 Afe- Federal $104,821 - 0
84.370 Soar-Cares Combined (academic Quality) $81,494 Yes 1
93.323 Covid-19 School Based Testing $58,219 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
V7ZHTHDX2FF4 Tiffany Godbout Auditee
2023730246 Tiana Wynn Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: All Federal grant operations of the Academy of Hope Adult Charter School (the School) are included in the scope of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Single Audit). The Single Audit was performed in accordance with the provisions of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement (the Compliance Supplement). Compliance testing of all requirements, as described in the Compliance Supplement, was performed for the major grant program noted below. The programs on the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (the Schedule) represents all Federal award programs with fiscal year 2022, cash or non-cash expenditure activities. For single audit testing, we tested to ensure coverage of at least 20% of Federally granted funds. Actual coverage is 66%. The major program tested are listed below. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule includes the Federal award activity of the School is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the cost principles contained in the Single Audit.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 U. S. Department of Education 84.370C ? DC Opportunity Scholarship Program Significant Deficiency over Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 1 out of 1 selections, management did not follow the appropriate method of procurement for contracts in excess of $25,000, in accordance with the Schools financial policies and procedures and as set forth by the DC PCSB. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.320: When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319. Cause: The contract was initially budgeted to be under $25,000 and was procured using small purchase procedures; however the total contract costs were $25,600 (which is greater than the School?s SAT) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect: The subrecipient may not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the School implement a process to monitor its vendors that are above $20,000, to ensure year to date costs do not exceed $25,000. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the corrective action plan. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-001 U. S. Department of Education 84.370C ? DC Opportunity Scholarship Program Significant Deficiency over Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 1 out of 1 selections, management did not follow the appropriate method of procurement for contracts in excess of $25,000, in accordance with the Schools financial policies and procedures and as set forth by the DC PCSB. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.320: When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319. Cause: The contract was initially budgeted to be under $25,000 and was procured using small purchase procedures; however the total contract costs were $25,600 (which is greater than the School?s SAT) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect: The subrecipient may not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the School implement a process to monitor its vendors that are above $20,000, to ensure year to date costs do not exceed $25,000. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the corrective action plan. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-001 U. S. Department of Education 84.370C ? DC Opportunity Scholarship Program Significant Deficiency over Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 1 out of 1 selections, management did not follow the appropriate method of procurement for contracts in excess of $25,000, in accordance with the Schools financial policies and procedures and as set forth by the DC PCSB. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.320: When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319. Cause: The contract was initially budgeted to be under $25,000 and was procured using small purchase procedures; however the total contract costs were $25,600 (which is greater than the School?s SAT) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect: The subrecipient may not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the School implement a process to monitor its vendors that are above $20,000, to ensure year to date costs do not exceed $25,000. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the corrective action plan. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-001 U. S. Department of Education 84.370C ? DC Opportunity Scholarship Program Significant Deficiency over Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 1 out of 1 selections, management did not follow the appropriate method of procurement for contracts in excess of $25,000, in accordance with the Schools financial policies and procedures and as set forth by the DC PCSB. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.320: When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319. Cause: The contract was initially budgeted to be under $25,000 and was procured using small purchase procedures; however the total contract costs were $25,600 (which is greater than the School?s SAT) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect: The subrecipient may not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the School implement a process to monitor its vendors that are above $20,000, to ensure year to date costs do not exceed $25,000. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the corrective action plan. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-001 U. S. Department of Education 84.370C ? DC Opportunity Scholarship Program Significant Deficiency over Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 1 out of 1 selections, management did not follow the appropriate method of procurement for contracts in excess of $25,000, in accordance with the Schools financial policies and procedures and as set forth by the DC PCSB. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.320: When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319. Cause: The contract was initially budgeted to be under $25,000 and was procured using small purchase procedures; however the total contract costs were $25,600 (which is greater than the School?s SAT) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect: The subrecipient may not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the School implement a process to monitor its vendors that are above $20,000, to ensure year to date costs do not exceed $25,000. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the corrective action plan. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-001 U. S. Department of Education 84.370C ? DC Opportunity Scholarship Program Significant Deficiency over Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 1 out of 1 selections, management did not follow the appropriate method of procurement for contracts in excess of $25,000, in accordance with the Schools financial policies and procedures and as set forth by the DC PCSB. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.320: When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319. Cause: The contract was initially budgeted to be under $25,000 and was procured using small purchase procedures; however the total contract costs were $25,600 (which is greater than the School?s SAT) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect: The subrecipient may not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the School implement a process to monitor its vendors that are above $20,000, to ensure year to date costs do not exceed $25,000. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to the corrective action plan. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.